1908 Tate v. Fullbrook Ct. App. L. J. Vaughan L. R. [1908] I K. B. 821 208 U. S. 260 Writer of dialogue sole author of musical sketch in England, 176 1908 United Dictionary U. S. Sup. Ct. J. Holmes, Co. v. Merriam Omission of notice on foreign-made edition sold only for use 1908 Dam v. Kirke La U. S. C. C. J. Hazel, 166 F. R. 589 Citizen of an unproclaimed country cannot indirectly obtain 1909 Bosselman v. Rich- U. S. C. C. J. Ward, 174 F. R. 622 Ill. Printing & Pub. Co. Pub. Week. 76: 643, 957 Peary letters - copyright in newspaper letter as book upheld, 103 1909 N. Y. Times v. U. S. C. C. Press Pub. Co. et al. J. Hand, Pub. Week. Peary letters agreement for newspaper letters did not au- 1909 Consolidated Gas U. S. Sup. Ct. J. Peckham, Co. 76: 643, 957 212 U. S. 19 State has sovereign power to limit prices-in case of public 1909 Freeman v. Trade U.S. C. C. J. Donworth, Register Copyright notice on editorial page invalid, 131 1909 Frohman v. Ferris Ill. Sup. Ct. J. Farmer, Performance of play not publication, 181 173 F. R. 419 238 Ill. Rep. 430 Error in classification does not invalidate copyright, 136 1909 Harper v. Kalem U.S. C. C. App. J. Ward, 169 F. R. 61 Moving pictures may infringe book copyright, 176, 242; both speech and action not necessary in dramatic performances, 176; illustrations as such do not infringe book copyright, 237 1909 Heinemann v. Smart Chancery J. Parker, Times, Jl. 15, '09 Set Pub. Co. Innocent publisher responsible for acts beyond authority given 1909 Hervieu v. Ogilvie U. S. C. C. J. Martin, 169 F. R. 978 Printed drama not subject to manufacturing provisions as 1909 Hunter v. Clifford West. Co. Ct. J. Lush, Times N.12. '09 Ct. App. 1909 Saake v. Lederer License to perform 1909 Scholz v. Amasis Right to copyright lapsed on work of art sold without registration, 247 1909 Karno v. Pathé Frères Exhibitor, not manufacturer of film, responsible party, 177 U.S. C. C. App. J. Buffington, 174 F. R. 135 does not imply authority to copyright, 107 Ct. App. L. C. J. Farwell, Times My. 19, L. J. Vaughan 100 L. T. 260 '09 England, 176 175 F. R. 902 J. McPherson, 182 F. R. 150 Only substantial copying of written dialogue infringes drama in 1910 Dam v. Kirke La U.S. C. C. App. J. Noyes, Shelle Co. Following decision in lower court 1910 De Jonge v. Breuk- U. S. C. C. er & Kessler Artistic designs for cover paper copyrightable, 237; separable designs must have separate copyright notices, 242; subject cannot be protected both under copyright and trade-mark acts, 237 1910 Eliot & Collier v. N. Y. Sup. Ct. J. Newburger, Jones, et al. Whole work enjoined where infringing parts were inseparable, 258 1910 Press Assoc. v. Re- Chancery porting Agency J. Warrington, Times D. 8, '10 175 F. R. 156 Election returns protected against "unfair competition," 89 1910 Record & Guide Co. U. S. C. C. J. McPherson, v. Bromley Piracy from surreptitiously obtained copies of poems punished 1910 Stern v. Remick U. S. C. C. J. Hand, Times Jl. 22,'10 175 F. R. 282 176 F. R. 833 Sale of single copy held to constitute publication, 127; use of One copyright notice suffices to cover earlier copyrights of parts, |