Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

COMMISSIONERS

OF THE

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE

DURING THE TIME OF THESE DECISIONS.

Hon. ELLIS SPEAR

To OCTOBER 31, 1878.

Hon. HALBERT E. PAINE

FROM NOVEMBER 1, 1878.

ASSISTANT AND ACTING COMMISSIONER,

Hon W. H. DOOLITTLE.

TABLE OF CASES.

DECISIONS OF THE COMMISSIONERS.

Page. 142 69

96

133

84

.65, 114

94

8 47 21 28

Alden, ex parte. (Trade-mark).
Anders, ex parte. (Appeal)
Bailey, Stephens v...
Barker, Leighton v ....
Bell et al., Gray v.
Bering v. Haworth. (Interference) ....
Bigelow, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Bird et al. v. Walsh. (Interference)...
Blackman v. Morray et al.. (Interference).
Blair, Kirchner v .....
Block & Co, ex parte. (Refundment of money paid by mistake).
Burge, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Caire, ex parte. (Trade-mark).........
Campbell, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)..
Cardwell, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Carter, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)..
Chesterman, Daniels v
Compton et al., Perkins et al. v.....
Connor v. Williams. (Interference. Clocks).
Consolidated Fruit Jar Co., The, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)....
Dailey, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Daniels v. Chesterman. (Interference)
Davis v. Scharffe. (Interference).
Dermody v. Pennock. (Interference)...
Designolle, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Doty, Funck v..
Ford et al., Scott v......
Funck, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Funck v. Doty. (Interference)
Gokey, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal. Wagon-axle cutter).
Gray v. Bell et al. (Interference. Telephones).
Hall & Co. et al., ex parte. (Trade-mark)...
Hamilton, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)..
Harrison, ex parte. (Reference)..
Haworth. Bering v......

131

88 124 104 26 32 137 101

3 26 63 93

10 18-77

106

89 18-77

144 133

42 16 58 84 128 119-126

Hoe et al. v. Scott. (Interference).....
Hoosier Drill Co. v. Ingels. (Interference).
Huttner et al. v. Knox et al. (Interlocutory appeal).
Huttner et al. v. Knox et al. (Motion for rehearing).

Page.

108 115

81 126

115 145 134

112

Ingels, Hoosier Drill Co. v. (Interference)
Ingersoll, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal. Paper dishes).
Ives, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal) ....
Jenks, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Kirchner v. Blair. (Interference)..
Knowles, Wyman v....
Knowlton, ex parte. (Appeal).
Knox et al., Huttner et al. v

47 35

130 .81-126

57 96

46

147

Langlois, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Leighton v. Barker. (Interference)....
Lisner, ex parte. (Trade-mark)
Locke, Withington v......
Marsching & Co., ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal. Trade-mark)
Mason, ex parte. (Appeal from Examiner-in-chief)
Mayor, ex parte. (Petition to revive application).
Morray et al., Blackman v.

143 31 60 8

51 14 6

93

32 72 23 24

111

67 111 62

Paine, ex parte. (Motion to suspend issue)
Parker, ex parte. (Trade-mark)..
Pease, Towers v .....
Pennock, Dermody v
Perkins et al. v. Compton et al. (Interference).
Powell, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Powell, Yost and Warner v
Prescott, Stearns v
Quimby v. Randall et al. (Interference)..
Rader & Co., ex parte. (Trade-mark).
Randall et al., Quimby v..
Rogers and Huggins, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Sanders, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)..
Scharffe, Davis v
Schoonmaker, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal).
Scott v. Ford et al. (Interference)...
Scott, Hoe et al. v
Sheldon, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)....
Shoeninger, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal. Design)
Simpson v. Wright et al. (Interference. Trade-mark).
Smith v. Wincholl et al. (Interference)
Stearns v. Prescott. (Interference).
Stephens r. Bailey. (Interference)..
Thomas, ex parte. (Trade-mark).
Towers.v. Pease. (Interference).
Walsh, Bird et al. v ....
Warburg & Co., ex parte. (Trade-mark)

66 63 40 106 108

44

75 24 7

113 6

94 5 190 424 319 276 433 278 185 335 102 260 249 163 163 194

Waring v. Wilkerson. (Interference. Dental chairs)
Wheat, ex parte
Williams, ex parte. (Interlocutory appeal)
Wiliams, Connor v.....
Winchell et al., Smith v....
Withington v. Locke. (Interference. Grain binder)..
Wright et al., Simpson v ....
Wyman v. Knowles. (Interference)
Yost and Warner v. Powell. (Interference)

Page.

120 110

87 137

75

147 .119-126

35

23

DECISIONS OF THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.

149

Ex parte Hunt. (Petition for completion and delivery of letters patent)......
McElwee v. Blackwell. (Interference)..

152

OPINION OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL.

Barsaloux, James and Lyon. (Patent void for misjoinder)..

154

DECISIONS OF UNITED STATES COURTS.

Abbe, Cone, Barton, and Conklin, copartners under the name of Gong Bell Man

ufacturing Company, v. Clark and Hilliard...
Abrams, Isaacs t.....
Adriance et al., Sprague and Parsons v..
American Cotton Tie Company, The, v. Simons et al.
American Whip Company, The, r. Lombard
Andrews et al. v. Wright.....
Anilin et al., v. Hamilton Manufacturing Company
Anilin et al., 1. Higgin et al .....
Anness et al., Reissner et al. v
Anness et al., Reissner et al. v
Ashcroft v. The Boston and Lowell R. R. Co
Atlantic Giant Powder Company, The, y, Goodyear....
Atlantic Giant Powder Company, The, v. Townsend ...
Atterbury et al. v. Gill, administrator of Beatty, deceased...
Bachof, Frese & Co.?....
Bailey, Collender v
Ballard et al., Gould et al. v
Barker t. Stowe...
Bartholomæ & Ræsing, Gottfried et al. v.
Baxter et al., Société la Anonyme des Mines et Fonderies de Zinc de la Vieille

Montagne v
Beale, Pennock v
Benham et al., Ingersoll r...
Berger, Mathes, et al., Norwalk Lock Company r.
Blackwell & Co. v. Dibrell & Co...
Blake v. Greenwood Cemetery
Bohmer, Duwell v
Boston and Lowell R. R. Co., Ashcroft v
Brooks v. Moorhouse...
Brown et al. v. Rubber Step Manufacturing Company et al......
Bullock Printing-Press Company v. Jones et al., treasurer of the New York Times.
Burrall et al. c. Rumsey et al ...

220
196
289
362
293

395 174 273 168 376 287 317 249 211 206 171 170

Page.

247 203

.....

City of Brooklyn, The, Guidet v..
Clapp, Wilson Packing Company et al. v ...,
Clark and Hilliard, Abbe, Cone, Barton, and Conklin, copartners under the

name of Gong Bell Manufacturing Company v
Clark et al., Garretson v.
Cole & Co., Hoe & Co. v
Colgate v. The Western Union Telegraph Company.
Collender v. Bailey ..
Comstock et al., 1. Sandusky Seat Company et al ......
Corbin et al., Hopkins & Dickinson Manufacturing Company v..
Darling, Kelleher et al. v
Davis, Schuessler v..
Denney, Odiorne v....
Dibrell & Co., Blackwell & Co., v.
Dickerson, Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Company, The, v ....
Draper v. The Potomska Mills Corporation..
Duwell v. Bohmer ...

190 343 213 440 196 182 301

381 286 270 376 197 192 317

407 356 373

Egbert, executrix, &c., v. Lippman et al......
Empire Transportation Company, The, et al., Williams & Albright v...
Ennis, Rogers v
Fleming, McLean v..
Foote v. Frost et al
Fortune Bros., Gottfried et al. v......
Frese & Co. v. Bachof....
Frost et al., Foote v......

262 421 293 220 421

[ocr errors]

Garretson v. Clark et al .....
Gas-Consumers' Association, Herring v......
Gill, administrator, Beatty, deceased, Atterbury et al. v...
Glick, Wright
Goff et al. v. Stafford et al .........
Goodyear, The Atlantic Giant Powder Company v
Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Company, The, v, Osgood.
Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Company, The, v. Dickerson,
Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Company, The, v. Lowe....
Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Company et al. v. Preterre.
Gottfried et al. v. Bartholomæ & Roesing
Gottfried et al. v. Fortune Bros
Gottfried et al. v. Schoenhofen
Gould ét al. v. Ballard et al.
Graves et al., Whiting v.
Gray et al. v. Hulshizer et al....
Great Western Quicksilver Mining Company, The, Knox et al. v
Greenwood Cemetery, Blake v.....
Grosvenor, Seabury et al. v
Guidet v. City of Brooklyn
Gunther, Schillinger v....
Hall & Co. v. Jones et al.
Hamilton v. Kingsbury et al......
Hamilton Manufacturing Company, Anilin and Fabrik v
Hart, Bliven & Mead, Manufacturing Company v. Sargeant & Co.et al.
Harwood et al., Mahn v
Henry v. The Providence Tool Company...

343 225 194 169 402 163 197 197 197 324 293 293 293 289 208 170 425 287 394 247 396

332 339 185 306 419 409

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »