Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

APPENDIX

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE
JANUARY,

WASHINGTON, TUESDAY,

Vol. 121

INTRODUCTION OF THE ACCELERATED CAPITAL FORMATION ACT OF 1975

The SPEAKER PRO tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Frenzel) is recognized for 30 minutes.

Mr. FRENZEL. Mr Speaker, I rise today to introduce the Accelerated Capital Formation Act of 1975. This is a refined version of H.R. 8590 which I introduced in the 93d Congress.

During the last session a great deal of progress in advancing the financing method known as ESOP or the employee stock ownership plan was made. A provision for study of the ESOP plan in restructuring the Penn Central and other Northeast and Midwest railroads was included as a vital section of the Railroad Reorganization Act. In the Pension Reform Act. signed into law last Labor Day, the ESOP was given special recognition as a form of employee benefit that could also be used to attract outside financing to meet the capital requirements of an expanding enterprise. In the Trade Reform Act companies utilizing ESOP will be given special preferences in the $1 billion program of federally guaranteed loans to companies expanding or locating in areas adversely affected by foreign competition. There were at least three other major pieces of legislation being considered in the 93d Congress which, though they did not reach the floor, contained ESOP provisions; these were railroad improvement loans, energy development and the Pan Am Assistance Act.

Though a great deal of progress has been made in recent years many people have questioned just what an ESOP does. Essentially, under existing law, the ESOP makes accessible to all corporate employees the techniques of corporate finance. Without any actual cash outlay from corporate employees - as in conventional employee stock purchase programs and without any deduction in take-home pay or fringe benefits an ESOP builds blocks of corporate shares into employee ownership while providing moneys necessary for capital requirements. It has been used to finance corporate expansion, acquire new assets, accomplish divestitures or spinoffs and finance mergers, et cetera.

A standard ESOP incorporates a deferred compensation trust - technically a qualified stock bonus trust alone or coupled with a money purchase pension trust into the financing process itself. In one common technique the employees trust borrows funds to invest in the employer corporation. This then allows the affected employees, subject only to the trusts paying off the loan, to become beneficial owners of the companies' stock.

The employer corporation obligates itself to make annual payments into the trust in amounts sufficient to amortize the debt out of tax deductible dollars.

The tax deduction makes it possible for the corporation to build greater capital ownership into the employees than it could otherwise, and the costs of financing its growth is about the same as if it conveniently borrowed and repaid as to principal - in after-tax dollars. After the employers stock has been paid for in this manner the trust can, if desired, be diversified by tax-free exchanges of stock for other securities, or by a public offering out of trust.

This ESOP method, simply stated, allows greater benefits to the corporation than common expansion and financing techniques and permits the employee to

[blocks in formation]

gain a larger share of the organization he serves than conventional profit-sharing methods.

The first known use of ESOP financing pioneered by Louis Kelso, involved an employee buy-out of a chain of California newspapers that was threatened with takeover by a major chain in 1956. But only in the last few years has the business world at large become aware of this innovation. A number of investment banking firms are pioneering this approach and several major firms have begun to recommend ESOP's to their clients. Over 100 corporations have, largely in the last year, adopted ESOP's including two of our larger electronic manufacturers. Many smaller firms and several major unions have adopted ESOP's.

In order to facilitate the use of the ESOP technique. and thus effectively link daily employee performance with the growth and operation of a business, the bill modifies the Internal Revenue Code as follows:

First, the bill removes the present statutory limitation of 25 percent of covered compensation as the maximum amount an employer can contribute to a qualified employee stock ownership plan when such payments are used to enable the plan to repay stock acquisition debt incurred in connection with meeting the employer's capital requirements. This places the sole limitation on financing contributions on the enterprise's capacity to service the debt out of cash flow. This reform reduces the cost of capital growth and transfers in the ownership of corporate assets, while accelerating the rate at which employees as individuals and as a group can accumulate stock of their employer and other income-yielding assets as a new and noninflationary form of employee benefit Although treated as a tax deduction, this change would have the same impact as an investment tax credit in terms of encouraging capital spending; however, the investment tax credit increases the concentration of corporate ownership while ESOP contributions correct this economic factor.

This also rechannels corporate profits that would otherwise have gone into the corporate income tax base into productivity increases of the private sector. thus generating lower prices for consumers, expanded private payrolls, and a broadening base of taxable personal incomes and personal estates among productive workers.

Second, the bill provides a tax deduction to corporations for the amount of dividends they distribute either directly as taxable second incomes on stock held in an employee's account or which are used to repay stock acquisition indebtedness of the employees' trust. This provision also converts taxable corporate income into either taxable dividend incomes for employees to supplement their paychecks or their retirement and social security incomes or a more rapid rate of accumulation by employees of individual capital estates for their retirement security.

Third, the bill provides that a qualified employee stock ownership plan and trust shall have the tax characteristics of a charitable organization for purposes of estate, gift, and income taxes. This would encourage affluent taxpayers to make gifts to qualified trusts in order to reconnect the ownership of capital with a broader base of private individuals, namely productive employees some of whom have contributed to the building of the donor's wealth. Allocations to participants of the trust would become an immediate source of taxable second incomes to the extent dividends

a

are passed through the trusts and a retirement estate for the employee-beneficiaries and their heirs On the other hand, Government would lose no tax revenues since such contributions made to charitable organizations are already exempt from taxation, and profits from donated income-producing property are frequently accumulated tax-free within such organizations

Fourth, the bill establishes a cutoff on further contributions in behalf of any employee when the value of the assets that employee has acquired during his working lifetime through one or more ESOP's exceeds $500,000. Such a safeguard on excessive accumulations acquired through tax deductions would be especially important in highly capital-intensive industries and would help foster more widespread and equitable sharing of ownership among Americans generally

Fifth, the bill adds to the options of ESOP participants when distributions are made when they retire. die. or are otherwise separated from service. Although profit sharing plans are permitted to make distributions in many forms, the Internal Revenue Service has ruled that distribution from an ESOP must be made exclusively in company stock.

Although enabling employees to accumulate sizable holdings of employer stock has obvious motivational value, when an employee leaves the company and can no longer directly influence the yield on the company stock accumulated in his ESOP account, it is desirable to provide the departing employee and the remaining employees, through their ESOP. to arrange an exchange for his accumulated assets with other income-yielding assets or cash of an equivalent value. This bill would provide ESOP's the same flexibility in making distributions that is now enjoyed by profit sharing plans.

Sixth, the bill permits a repurchase option for plans of enterprises that are wholly owned by their employees, so that stock of departing employees can remain exclusively held within the employee group.

Seventh, the bill exempts lump sum distributions of Income-yielding estates derived from an ESOP from any form of taxation, provided the assets are held to produce a taxable second income for the taxpayer or his beneficiaries. However, if the assets are converted into spendable income and not reinvested within 60 days, the uninvested proceeds will be taxed as ordinary income, instead of partially at the lower capital gains rate permitted under present law.

Eighth, the bill enables affected parties to seek advance IRS opinions on valuations on stock or other assets acquired by an ESOP where the parties to a financing transaction which utilizes an ESOP would be subject to serious risks or penalties it the IRS, upon subsequent audit, disagreed with the valuations or other key features of the financing plan. This is similar to the "no action" procedures already instituted by the FTC and SEC.

Ninth, the bill exempts payments to an ESOP made for financing purposes from treatment as a conventional employee benefit for purposes of any wage, salary, deferred compensation, or other employee benefit controls or guidelines that might be established under executive order, regulations, or future economic stabilization laws at the Federal or State levels. Instead, it would be treated as any other form of capital spending that would have a counterinflationary effect. In effect, it offers labor a trade-off for wage increases where wage ceilings are established.

I hope that the members of this body will carefully consider the legislation. I am hopeful that further progress can be made in this session.

A copy of the bill follows:

H.R.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TITLE. — This Act may be cited as the "Accelerated Capital Formation Act of 1975,

SEC 2 PURPOSE - The purpose of this Act is to provide incentives for accelerated financing of the formation of U.S. corporate capital and to encourage voluntary means for broadly diffusing equity ownership among employees of U.S. enterprises both (a) with respect to existing capital by means consistent with the protection of private property and (b) with respect to newly formed capital by means which extend the logic of conventional business finance to corporate employees.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 is amended by adding the following new Section 416 at the end of Subpart B of Part I of Subchapter D of Chapter 1

SEC: 416 EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN FINANCING.

(a) DEFINITIONS (1) "Employee stock ownership plans means a technique of corporate finance described in Section 4975(e)(7) that utilizes stock bonus plans, or stock bonus plans coupled with money purchase pension plans, which satisfy the requirements of Section 401(a) and are designed

(A) to invest primarily in qualifying employer securities;

(B) to meet general financing requirements of a corporation, including capital growth and transfers in the ownership of corporate stock;

(C) to build into employees beneficial ownership of qualifying employer securities;

(D) to receive loans or other extensions of credit to acquire qualifying employer securities, with such loans and credit secured primarily by a commitment by the employer to make future payments to the plan in amounts sufficient to enable such loans and interest thereon to be repaid, and

(E) to limit the liability of the plan for repayment of any such loan to payments received from the employer and to qualifying employer securities. and dividends thereon, acquired with the proceeds of such loan, to the extent such loan is not yet repaid.

(2) For purposes of this section, the term "employer securities means securities issued by the employer corporation, or by an affiliate of such employer.

(3) For purposes of this section, the term "qualifying employer securities means common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, issued by the employer corporation, or by an affiliate of such emplover.

(b) Special Deductions. (1) In addition to the deductions provided under section 404 (a), there shall be allowed as a deduction to an employer the amount of any dividend paid by such employer during the taxable year with respect to employer securities, provided

(A) such employer securities were held on the record date for such dividend by an employee stock ownership plan; and

(B) the dividend received by such plan is distributed not later than 60 days after the close of the plan year in which it is received, to the employees participating in the plan, in accordance with the plan proVISIONS, or

(C) the dividend received by such plan is applied, not later than 60 days after the close of the taxable year, to the payment of acquisition indebtedness (including interest) incurred by the plan for the purchase of qualifying employer securities.

(2) Notwithstanding the limitations of section 404(a), there shall be allowed as a deduction to an employer the amount of any contributions paid on account of a taxable year (as described in section 404(a)(6) to an employee stock ownership plan, provided such contributions are applied to the payment of acquisition indebtedness (including interest) incurred by the plan for the purchase of qualifying employer securities.

(3) For purposes of sections 170(b)(1), 642(c), 2055 (a), and 2522, a contribution, bequest, or similar transfer of employer securities or other property to an employee stock ownership plan shall be deemed a charit

b

able contribution to an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). provided

(A) such contribution, bequest, or transfer is allocated. pursuant to the terms of such plan, to the employees participating under the plan in a manner consistent with section 401(a)(4):

(B) no part of such contribution, bequest or transfer is allocated under the plan for the benefit of the taxpayer (or decedent). or any person related to the taxpayer (or decedent) under the provisions of Section 267(b). or any other person who owns more than 25% in value of any class of outstanding employer securities under the provisions of Section 318(a); and

(C) such contribution, bequest or transfer is made only with the express approval of such employee stock ownerhsip plan.

(c) Treatment of Participants. (1) Qualifying employer securities acquired by an employee stock ownership plan through acquisition indebtedness incurred by the plan in connection with the financing of capital requirements of the employer corporation or its affiliates must be allocated to the accounts of the participating employees to the extent that contributions and dividends received by the plan are applied to the payment of such acquisition indebtedness (including interest), in accordance with the terms of the plan and in a manner consistent with Section 401(a)(4).

(2) Upon retirement, death. or other separation from service, an employee participating under an employee stock ownership plan (or his beneficiary, in the event of death) will be entitled to a distribution of his nonforfeitable interest under the plan in employer securities or other investments allocated to his account, in accordance with the provisions of such plan. If the plan so provides. the employee (or beneficiary) may elect to receive all or a portion of the distribution from the plan in

(A) employer securities. other than qualifying emplover securities.

(B) cash;

(C) a diversified portfolio of securities:

(D) a non-transferable annuity contract, or

(E) any combination of the above

(3) An employee stock ownership plan may provide for the required repurchase of qualifying employer securities from an individual receiving a distribution thereof if all other of such outstanding employer securities, whether or not acquired through the plan. are subject to repurchase from non-employee shareholders under similar circumstances.

(4) Upon receipt of a lump sum distribution, as described in Section 402(e)(4)(A), from an employee stock ownership plan, an individual may exclude from gross income that part of the distribution which consists of employer securities or other assets, if income producing, held or reinvested within 60 days in income producing assets of equivalent value, for the purpose of providing the individual with dividends or other forms of realized income from such assets. Upon

subsequent sale or disposition of any employer securities or other assets distributed by an employee stock ownership plan to the extent that proceeds realized from such sale or disposition are not reinvested with in 60 days in income producing assets, the total amount of such proceeds (or the fair market value of any such securities or assets that are transferred without adequate consideration) shall be treated as ordinary income to the individual.

(5) An employee receiving a distribution under paragraph (b)(1)(B) of this Section shall be subject to taxation under Section 402(a)(1), and the provisions of Section 116 shall not apply to such distribution.

(6) A contribution by an employer which is deductible under paragraph (b)(2) of this Section, or a contribution described in paragraph (b)(3) of this Section, shall not be included in the meaning of annual addition under Section 415(c)(2).

(7) No contribution to an employee stock ownership plan may be allocated for the benefit of any participant if the value of the total accumulation of employer securities and other investments under the plan for the benefit of that participant equals or exceeds $500.000, less the amount of any such accumulation for that participant under any other employee stock ownership plans.

(d) Special Provisions. (1) The acquisition or holding of qualifying employer securities and the incurring of acquisition indebtedness by an employee stock ownership plan shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of Section 404(a)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 provided that

(A) the requirements of Section 408(b)(3) and 408 (e) of such Act are satisfied; and

(B) the same standards of prudence and fiduciary responsibility that corporate management must exercise with respect to its shareholders are satisfied.

(2) Upon application by an employee stock ownership plan, the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate shall issue an advance opinion as to whether a proposed transaction involving that employee stock ownership plan will satisfy all the requirements described in paragraph (1) of this subsection, and any such opinion shall be binding upon the Secretary.

SEC. 4 Effect of Economic Stabilization. Payments by an employer to an employee stock ownership plan as defined in Section 416(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, for the purpose of enabling such plan to pay acquisition indebtedness incurred for the purchase of qualifying employer securities or other contributions to such plan shall not be treated as compensation, fringe benefits or deferred compensation payments for the purposes of any laws. executive orders or regulations designed to control. establish guidelines or otherwise stabilize employee compensation or benefits. but shall be treated as the equivalent of debt service payments made in the normal course of financing the capital requirements of that employer.

с

WORKER-OWNED PLANTS

(By Gus Tyler)

NEW YORK. In the Pacific Northwest, there are 16 plywood plants that consistently show higher productivity than their competitors. All of these superfirms are owned by their employes.

These companies are not fly-by-night operations. The first of them-Olympia Plywood-came into being in 1921 when 125 carpenters, mechanics and lumberman chipped in $1,000 apiece. In return for the small investment, each worker got a job, an equal share in company profits, and an equal voice in running the plant.

Other workers followed a similar pattern to become the owner-employes of companies whose businesses range from $3 million to $20 million in gross revenues with work forces of between 80 and 450 people.

The method of compensation is startling, almost unbelievable. Everybody in the plant is paid the same wage. Describing the unusual pay system in World of Work Report (May 1977) Paul Bernstein of the University of California at Irvine notes:

"Highly skilled workers sometime resent not receiving more pay than men who do the simplest jobs in the firm. Because their roots are in a cooperative, egalitarian philosophy, the mills pay all members an equal wage-floorsweeper, skilled panelfinisher, and accountant alike."

BALANCING ACT

A problem arises on those occasions when some workers spend more time than others on the job for one reason or another. This little difficulty is handled in a novel and sophisticated way.

If a worker falls short on hours, he will have a chance to make up for it by weekend or overtime work; if another worker has put in unusually long hours, he must work less the next week.

The plant is run by a manager who is hired by the Board of Directors that, in turn, is elected by the worker-owners.

By conventional wisdom, these plants should show low productivity for at least two reasons. First, if workers are their own boss, who will be there to crack the whip; second, if everybody gets paid the same, where is the incentive to work hard.

PRODUCTIVITY SURGES

Yet, lo and behold, these plants regularly outperform their rivals. In 1950, these cooperatives turned out 115 to 120 square feet of plywood per man-hour as against the 80 to 85 square feet for their competitors. In 1960, the former turned out 170 square feet as against their rivals' 130.

Because productivity is high, wages are high. Indeed, the Internal Revenue Service thought the wages were too high and was a trick of these companies to cut down corporate profits to avoid paying corporate taxes. But the IRS charge failed because the companies were able to prove that their high productivity justified these high wages.

Why have these plants been successful? Apparently, because these workers feel that this is their very own thing. The company's success is their own personal success. They take pride in the company; they also make a good profit from it. Shares bought at $1,000 now sell at $20,000 to $40,000.

[merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small]
« iepriekšējāTurpināt »