...have been apprehended. The act of a third persou intervening and contributing a condition necessary to the injurious effect of the original negligence...original negligence still remains a culpable and direct canse of the injury. The test is to be found in the probable injurious consequences, which were to...

...Lane v. Atlantic World, 111 Mass. 136, ,t was said: 'The test is to be fonnd in the probable injurions consequences which were to be anticipated, not in...subsequent events and agencies which might arise.' Events may cast their shadows before, so as to render an act wrong, but they cannot cast them backward,...

...and contributing a condition necessary to the injurious effect of the original negligence will n6t excuse the first wrongdoer, if such act ought to have been foreseen. — Marlon v. Jones, Cal.. 186 Pac. 410. 72. Last Clear Chance. — The essentials of last clear chance...

...against, the original negligence continued and remained a culpable and direct cause of the injury,and the test is to be found in the probable injurious...subsequent events and agencies which might arise. Lane v. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass. 130. Mr. Wharton on Negligence, § 85, states the doctrine thus:...

...INTERVENING ACT OF ANOTHER. The aot of a third person intervening and contributing a condition necessary to the injurious effect of the original negligence...wrongdoer, if such act ought to have been foreseen. Appeal from Superior Court, Los Angeles County ; John M. York, Judge. Action by Mary Marton against...

...the act complained of was the remote or proximate cause of the injury is to be found in the probably injurious consequences which were to be anticipated,...subsequent events and agencies which might arise. 1 Thompson's Commentaries on the Law of Negligence, § 58." In the case of Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co....

...It will be seen from the various expressions made by the authorities upon this vexing subject that the test is to be found in the probable injurious consequences which were to be anticipated and not in the number of subsequent events or agencies which might arise. In other words, if the probable...

...of recovery to depend upon the injury which the evidence may show followed asa sequence of the act. "The test is to be found in the probable injurious...subsequent events and agencies which might arise." Lane v. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass. 136. True, if the question be whether or not the injurious act was...

...reasonably apprehended. The act of a third person Intervening and contributing a condition necessary to the injurious effect of the original negligence,...subsequent events and agencies which might arise." Colt, J., in Lane v. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass. 136. In that case the negligence charged consisted in...

...have been .-ipprehended. The act of a third person, intervening and contributing a condition necessary to the injurious effect of the original negligence, will not excuse the first wrongdoers, if such act ought to have been foreseen. The original negligence still remains a culpable...