 Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation...  Rules of Evidence: Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, First Session - 7. lappuseautors: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Special Subcommittee on Reform of Federal Criminal Laws - 1973 - 589 lapasPilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
 | 1999 - 522 lapas
...may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (b) Testimony shall be given under oath or affirmation and witnesses shall be subject to cross-examination.... | |
 | 1999 - 520 lapas
...may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (b) Testimony shall be given under oath or affirmation and witnesses shall be subject to cross-examination.... | |
 | 1999 - 678 lapas
...provides for exclusion of evidence where its incremental probative value is substantially outweighed by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. Roughly speaking undue delay can be argued to refer to delay caused by the failure of the party to... | |
 | 1998 - 584 lapas
...provides for exclusion of evidence where its incremental probative value is substantially outweighed by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. Roughly speaking undue delay can be argued to refer to delay caused by the failure of the party to... | |
 | 2006 - 670 lapas
...provides for exclusion of evidence where its incremental probative value is substantially outweighed by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. Roughly speaking undue delay can be argued to refer to delay caused by the failure of the party to... | |
 | 2002 - 1140 lapas
...value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice or confusion of the issues, or considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (3) Evidence that would be inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence need not be deemed or ruled... | |
 | 2000 - 1016 lapas
...value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice or confusion of the issues, or considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (3) Evidence that would be inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence need not be deemed or ruled... | |
 | 2000 - 1024 lapas
...value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice or confusion of the issues, or considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (3) Evidence that would be inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence need not be deemed or ruled... | |
 | 1993 - 592 lapas
...immaterial evidence. (d) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of 171.32 §71.38 undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (e)... | |
 | 1992 - 464 lapas
...immaterial evidence. (d) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. (e) Although relevant,... | |
| |
