Rules of Evidence: Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, First Session
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Special Subcommittee on Reform of Federal Criminal Laws
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973 - 589 lappuses
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
accused action admissible admitted adopted Advisory Committee allowed amendment appears apply Association authority believe called changes character civil claim Code communication concerning conduct Congress considered constitutional conviction counsel course crime criminal cross-examination DEAR decision defendant definition determination direct disclosure District draft effect examination exception existing expert extent fact Federal Rules further give given habit hearing hearsay House HUNGATE impeachment indicate interest issue judge judicial jury Justice lawyer limited March matter Note objection offered officer opinion original party permit person position practice present presumption prior privilege problem Procedure proceedings proof proposed rule prove question reason recommendation record reference relating relevant Representatives respect result Revised Rules of Evidence scope showing Special specific stand statement Subcommittee subdivision submitted substantial suggested Supreme Court testify testimony tion trial United Washington witness writing
7. lappuse - Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
124. lappuse - The head of each department is authorized to prescribe regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the government of his department, the conduct of its officers and clerks, the distribution and performance of its business, and the custody, use. and preservation of the records, papers, and property appertaining to it.
61. lappuse - Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, to which the various advisory committees report.
386. lappuse - A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, unless the source of information...
253. lappuse - The court shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, (2) avoid needless consumption of time, and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
327. lappuse - ... (8) contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or (9) geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.
164. lappuse - ... a juror may testify on the question whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury's attention or whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror.
156. lappuse - Except as otherwise required by the Constitution of the United States or provided by Act of Congress or in rules prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority, the privilege of a witness, person, government, State, or political subdivision thereof shall be governed by the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason...
369. lappuse - When, after an event, measures are taken which, if taken previously, would have made the event less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event.