Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

OF

CASES DETERMINED

IN

THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE

STATE OF ILLINOIS,

AT

APRIL TERM, 1861, AND JANUARY TERM,

1862.

BY E. PECK,

COUNSELOR AT LAW.

VOLUME XXVI.

CHICAGO, ILL.:
E. B. MYERS, LAW BOOK PUBLISHER,
(Successor to D. B. COOKE & Co.)

1862.

ENTERED ACCORDING TO THE ACT OF CONGRESS, IN THE YEAR 18ti2, BY

E. PECK, IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF TIE UNITED STATES, POR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.

hue. Masjp462

PULTON & CO.
PRINTERS AND BINDERS,

CHICAGO, ILL.

JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT.

CHIEF JUSTICE,

JOHN D. CATON.

ASSOCIATE JUSTICES,

PINKNEY H. WALKER.
SIDNEY BREESE.

TABLE OF CASES.

PAGE

PAGE

B

et al.

A Asay v. Sparr

115 Chicago, St. Charles and MissisArmstrong ads. Eastman.

216 sippi R. R. Co. v. Larned 218 American Express Company v.

Corbin et al. v. McChesney. 231 Baldwin

504 City of Chicago ads. Roberts 249

Chicago, Burlington and Quincy R.

R. Co v. Dewey, Adm'x, etc. 255 Ballance ads. Carroll 9 Campbell ads. Warner et al.

282 Brown v. People . 28 City of Pekin v. Newell..

320 Booth et al. v. Rees 45 City of Peoria v. Kidder

351 Bacon v. Lawrence.. 53 Cruikshank v. Cogswell.

366 Bishop Hill Colony v. Edgerton Cogswell ads. Cruikshank.. 366

54 Chicago, Burlington and Quincy R. Buell et al. ads. Johnson, impl., etc. 66 R. Co. v. Hazzard...

373 Butterworth et al. v. Brown et al. . 156 Chicago and Rock Island R. R. Co. Brown et al. ads. Butterworth et al. 156 v. Morris et al., Adm’rs, etc. 400 Bonham ads. Dement et al. 158 Covill et al. v. Phy..

432 Barrett et al. ads. Hale et al. 195 Chicago and Milwaukee R. R. Co. Blumb ads. Silsbury, impl., etc. 287 ads. Shute

436 Baumgarten ads. Wolbrecht .. 291 City of Chicago ads. De Wolf 443 Bull ads. Maher, impl., etc.

348
Cast v. Roff, Adm'r, etc.

452 Brown et ux. ads. Wheeler.... 369 Carter v. Barnes et ux.

454 Brown et al. v. Moore.. 421 City of Chicago r. Roth

456 Berly ads. Tobey

426 Same ads. First Methodist EpisBarnes et ux. ads. Carter 454 copal Church, etc.

482 Brown v Haggerty.

469

Currier v. Ford . Bourland v. Sickles et al.

497 Chickering et al. v. Failes, surv., Beckwith v. People.....

500
etc., et al.

507 Baldwin ads. American Express Co. 504 Cessford ads. Fell.

522 Blount v. Tomlin et al.

531 Biggs ads. West ....

533

D
Dooley v. Stipp....

488

86 Davis v. Ransom et al.

100 Carroll v. Ballance... 9 Dement et al. v. Bonham

158 Chumasero v. Gilbert. 39 De Wolf v. Strader et al.

225 Same v. Same 39 Davis v. Randall et al.

243 Same v. Same

39 Dewey, Adm'x, etc., ads. Chicago, Collinson ads. Joslyn.

61 Burlington and Quincy R. R. Čo. 255 Campbell v. Conover 64 De Wolf v. City of Chicago

443 Conover ads. Campbell 64 Deal et al. v. Dodge et al.

458 Chester et ux. v. Rumsey

97 Dodge et al. ads. Deal et al. 458 Campbell et al. v. Gilman

120 Carpenter, use, etc., v. Mooers 162

D City of Chicago ads. Wilder et al., Edgerton et al. ads. Bishop Hill Colimpl., etc. 182 ony

54 Chicago and Rock Island R. R. Co. Ely et al. v. Eastwood et ux. 107 ads. Evans

189 Eastwood et ux. ads. Ely et al. 107

O

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »