State Technical Services Act; Extension: Hearing, Ninetieth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 16824 ... [and] S. 3245 ... June 19, 1968

Pirmais vāks
 

Atlasītās lappuses

Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu

Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes

Populāri fragmenti

8. lappuse - To promote commerce and encourage economic growth by supporting State and Interstate programs to place the findings of science usefully In the hands of American enterprise...
16. lappuse - Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming i Plan requirement after July 1, 1963.
30. lappuse - Mr. Chairman. I appreciate having this opportunity to present our views and will be happy to answer any questions. The CHAIRMAN-.
3. lappuse - ... apply the findings of science to business, commerce, and industry to encourage economic growth of the States and the entire Nation. The keystone of the legislation is local leadership, local initiative, local participation, and local resources. To date, every State, together with Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia, has designated an agency to administer and coordinate programs under the State Technical Services Act, In addition, nearly every State has prepared...
5. lappuse - Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, it is a great privilege for me to appear before...
29. lappuse - S. 949 because of its potentially great impact on the entire engineering profession. As a technical information dissemination program — which is what we have been told by administration officials is intended — we believe it would be of great benefit to industry, to the engineering profession, and to our society as a whole. However, if administered to provide federally subsidized technical or engineering services in direct competition with private firms or individuals, we believe the program would...
11. lappuse - States — actually backed by State matching funds — for $6.2 million, 41 percent more than the amount we could allocate to match State program funds. In fiscal year 1969, we expect program requests from all 50 States, together with Guam. Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia, and even the $5.37 million allocated in our budget request would be far from adequate.
10. lappuse - ... STATEMENT BY THE CHAIRMAN The CHAIRMAN. The committee will please come to order. Today the Senate Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences begins its hearings on the Fiscal Year 1969 authorization bill, S. 2918. These hearings will continue through March 14. We will take testimony from witnesses from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Department of Defense, the Atomic Energy Commission and the scientific community. The Department of Defense witnesses will appear in a closed...
1. lappuse - SEC. 103. Section 8 of said Act, as amended, is hereby amended by striking the period at the end of subsection (a) and inserting a colon and the following: "And provided further, That no mortgage shall be insured under this section after the effective date of the Housing Act of 1954, except pursuant to a commitment to insure issued on or before such date.
9. lappuse - ... non-Federal funds for technical service programs. There are three sources f such funds — State appropriations, institutional funds, and user fees. In the years of our program, user fees have accounted for more and more of the non'ederal share — about 6 percent in the first year and nearly one-third in the curent year.

Bibliogrāfiskā informācija