| Patrick J. Flinn - 2000 - 1388 lapas
...business not permissible where royalty on infringing assets sold was paid). 206 318 F. Supp. at 1120 ("[t]he portion of the realizable profit that should be credited to the invention as distinguished from non-patented elements" is one factor for determining reasonable royalty).... | |
| Peter S. Canelias - 2001 - 736 lapas
...business or in comparable businesses to allow for the use of the invention or analogous inventions; 13. the portion of the realizable profit that should be credited to the invention as distinguished from non-patented elements, the manufacturing process, business risks, or... | |
| Mark A. Glick, Lara A. Reymann, Richard Hoffman - 2002 - 504 lapas
...use of the invention or analogous inventions. I do not have information on analogous inventions. 8. The portion of the realizable profit that should be credited to the invention as distinguished from non-patented elements, the manufacturing process, business risks, or... | |
| Peter Toren - 2003 - 916 lapas
...business or in comparable businesses to allow for the use of the invention or analogous inventions. "13) The portion of the realizable profit that should be credited to the invention as distinguished from non-patented elements, the manufacturing process, business risks, or... | |
| James R. Hitchner, Michael J. Mard - 2003 - 241 lapas
...business or in comparable businesses to allow for the use of the invention or analogous inventions. Q 13. The portion of the realizable profit that should be credited to the invention as distinguished from nonpatented elements, the manufacturing process, business risks, or... | |
| Gordon V. Smith, Russell L. Parr - 2004 - 479 lapas
...used the rule in litigation have done so in the context of evaluating Georgia-Pacific factor 13 — "the portion of the realizable profit that should be credited to the invention as distinguished from non-patented elements, the manufacturing process, business risks, or... | |
| Russell L. Parr, Gordon V. Smith - 2005 - 890 lapas
...used the rule in litigation have done so in the context of evaluating Georgia-Pacific factor 13 — "the portion of the realizable profit that should be credited to the invention as distinguished from non-patented elements, the manufacturing process, business risks, or... | |
| Daniel Slottje - 2006 - 338 lapas
...business or in comparable businesses to allow for the use of the invention or analogous inventions. 12. The portion of the realizable profit that should be credited to the invention as distinguished from nonpatented elements, the manufacturing process, business risks, or... | |
| |