Rethinking Informed Consent in BioethicsCambridge University Press, 2007. gada 29. marts Informed consent is a central topic in contemporary biomedical ethics. Yet attempts to set defensible and feasible standards for consenting have led to persistent difficulties. In Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics, first published in 2007, Neil Manson and Onora O'Neill set debates about informed consent in medicine and research in a fresh light. They show why informed consent cannot be fully specific or fully explicit, and why more specific consent is not always ethically better. They argue that consent needs distinctive communicative transactions, by which other obligations, prohibitions, and rights can be waived or set aside in controlled and specific ways. Their book offers a coherent, wide-ranging and practical account of the role of consent in biomedicine which will be valuable to readers working in a range of areas in bioethics, medicine and law. |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics Neil C. Manson,Onora O'Neill Priekšskatījums nav pieejams - 2007 |
Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics Neil C. Manson,Onora O'Neill Priekšskatījums nav pieejams - 2007 |
Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics Neil C. Manson,Onora O'Neill Priekšskatījums nav pieejams - 2007 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
accounts of informed action approach argue arguments autonomy begin better biomedical practice Cambridge clear clinical communicative transactions consent disclosures CONSENT IN BIOETHICS consent in biomedicine consider contemporary danger debate about informed Demands difficulties discussion event distinctive elaborate ensure epistemic and ethical erning ethical flowing fully explicit genetic Genetics Knowledge given hand hard held identify impersonal importance informational obligations informed consent procedures informed consent requirements informed consent transactions institutional interest interventions Jane John King’s College Martin Richards matter medicine meet NEIL norms occasion offer ONORA O’NEILL particularly particularly grateful patients and research Philosophy policies Preface prohibitions propose Public range relevant research subjects Respect RETHINKING INFORMED CONSENT right to know role seen Simon Goldhill sorts of communicative sought specific standards successful talk thank thought transfer transparency Trust types of information University views waive workshops
Populāri fragmenti
xiv. lappuse - In any research on human beings, each potential subject must be adequately informed of the aims, methods, sources of funding, any possible conflicts of interest, institutional affiliations of the researcher, the anticipated benefits and potential risks of the study and the discomfort it may entail.
ix. lappuse - ... and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon...
xiv. lappuse - After ensuring that the subject has understood the information, the physician should then obtain the subject's freely given informed consent, preferably in writing. If the consent cannot be obtained in writing, the non-written consent must be formally documented and witnessed. 23. When obtaining informed consent for the research project the physician should be particularly cautious if the subject is in a dependent relationship with the physician or may consent under duress. In that case the informed...