 | United States. Patent Office - 1968 - 128 lapas
...of Morgan v. Daniels, 153 US 121, 125, in the following language: "Upon principle and authority, ... it must be laid down as a rule that where the question...contrary is established by testimony which in character and amount carries thorough conviction." This doctrine has been applied in numerous cases. Among them... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1910 - 642 lapas
...as a rule that where the question decided in the Patent Office is one between contesting parties us to priority of invention, the decision there made...contrary is established by testimony which in character and amount carries thorough conviction. There are four admitted facts with respect to Watson's diligence:... | |
 | 1894 - 922 lapas
...decision on those questions is final, except as they may be reversed on appeal in that department." Upon principle and authority therefore it must be...contrary is established by testimony which in character and amount carries thorough conviction. Tested by that rule, the solution of this controversy is not... | |
 | 1897 - 2078 lapas
...aside a Judgment, and, as such, is not tu be sustained by a mere preponderance of evidence. * * * LJIOU principle and authority, therefore, it must be laid...contrary is established by testimony which in character and sniouut carries thorough conviction.'' Morgan v. Daniels, 153 US 124, 125, 14 Sap. Ct. 773. Tested... | |
 | 1923 - 1092 lapas
...Daniels, 153 US 120, 14 Sup. Ct. 772, 38 L. Ed. 657, it was said that upon principle and authority it must be laid down — "as a rule that where the...contrary is established by testimony which in character and amount carries thorough conviction." The plaintiff has successfully met the requirements laid down... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1894 - 756 lapas
...Opinion of the Court. questions is final, except as they may be reversed on appeal in that department." Upon principle and authority, therefore, it must be...contrary is established by testimony which in character and amount carries thorough conviction. Tested by that rule the solution of this controversy is not... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1895 - 784 lapas
...UNDER SECTION 4915— PRIORITY OP INVENTION — AWAKD BY THE PATENT OFFICE PRIMA FACIE CONTROLLING. Where the question decided in the Patent Office is...question of fact in any subsequent suit between the parties, unless the contrary is established by testimony which in character and amount carries thorough... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1896 - 896 lapas
...question between contending parties as to priority of invention has been decided in the Patent Office the decision there made must be accepted as controlling...upon that question of fact in any subsequent suit or proceeding between the same parties, unless the contrary be established by testimony which in character... | |
 | District of Columbia. Court of Appeals - 1896 - 610 lapas
...question between contending parties, as to priority of invention, has been decided in the Patent Office, the decision there made must be accepted as controlling,...upon that question of fact, in any subsequent suit or proceeding between the same parties, unless the contrary be established by testimony which, in character... | |
| |
Upon principle and authority, therefore, it must be laid down as a rule that where the question decided in the Patent Office is one between contesting parties as to priority of invention, the decision there made must be accepted as controlling upon that... 
