Revision of Patent Office Interference Practice: Hearings Before the Committee on Patents, House of Representatives, Seventy-eithth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 3264, to Amend the Patent Laws with Respect to Practice in Interference Cases. February 24, 1944U.S. Government Printing Office, 1944 - 95 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 13.
10. lappuse
... existing patent , why , there won't be any administrative award . Mr. HALE . On page 2 , line 22 , the final sentence would read : If such rejection is adhered to , the rejected applicant shall have the option of appealing from such ...
... existing patent , why , there won't be any administrative award . Mr. HALE . On page 2 , line 22 , the final sentence would read : If such rejection is adhered to , the rejected applicant shall have the option of appealing from such ...
12. lappuse
... existing interference practice frequently offers inducements to contest an interference so long as the existence of the interference assures that no patent shall be granted to any of the parties . Every patent lawyer is familiar with ...
... existing interference practice frequently offers inducements to contest an interference so long as the existence of the interference assures that no patent shall be granted to any of the parties . Every patent lawyer is familiar with ...
13. lappuse
... existing inter- ference practice disregards this public interest . H. R. 3264 proposes to abolish all interference proceedings in the Patent Office in favor of priority proceedings in court . In many cases where an interference is now ...
... existing inter- ference practice disregards this public interest . H. R. 3264 proposes to abolish all interference proceedings in the Patent Office in favor of priority proceedings in court . In many cases where an interference is now ...
14. lappuse
... existing practice , no patent shall issue to either party until the termination of the priority proceedings in court . The third is a compromise be- tween these two and involves the administrative award . Accordingly , section 4904 of ...
... existing practice , no patent shall issue to either party until the termination of the priority proceedings in court . The third is a compromise be- tween these two and involves the administrative award . Accordingly , section 4904 of ...
31. lappuse
... existing Court of Customs and Patent Appeals to function as such a court . To provide that the term of a patent shall run for 20 years from the date of filing , instead of 17 years from the date of the grant , which would be a most ...
... existing Court of Customs and Patent Appeals to function as such a court . To provide that the term of a patent shall run for 20 years from the date of filing , instead of 17 years from the date of the grant , which would be a most ...
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
adjudication administrative award adverse parties reside American Bar Association applications for patents approval award of priority BARNETT Board of Appeals Board of Interference Byerly Byerly's chairman Church bill Commissioner of Patents Committee on Patents Court of Customs Customs and Patent decide decision declared delay district courts District of Columbia Edmonds effect expense fact February 24 ference filing date final hearing infringement Interference Examiners interference procedure interference proceedings interfering patent involved junior party jurisdiction LANHAM litigation motions obtain a patent paragraph Patent Appeals patent attorneys patent granted patent interference Patent Law Association patent lawyer Patent Office Society patent section patent system patentable subject matter pending application present interference practice present practice prior art prior inventor priority of invention priority proceedings proofs question of priority record reduction to practice rejected applicant result senior application subject matter suggested suit tion title 35 United States Patent vote
Populāri fragmenti
59. lappuse - Sutton, chairman of the section of patent, trade-mark, and copyright law of the association.
16. lappuse - Office at the time of the decision complained of, but any party in interest may become a party to the action. If there be adverse parties residing in a plurality of districts not embraced within the same state...
48. lappuse - Whenever a patent on application is refused, either by the Commissioner of Patents or by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia upon appeal from the Commissioner, the applicant may have remedy by bill in equity; and the court having cognizance thereof, on notice to adverse parties and other due proceedings had, may adjudge that such applicant is entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for his invention, as specifted in his claim, or for any part thereof, as the facts in the case may...
48. lappuse - Commissioner to issue such patent on the applicant filing in the Patent Office a copy of the adjudication and otherwise complying with the requirements of law. In all cases where there is no opposing party a copy of the bill shall be served on the Commissioner; and all the expenses of the proceedings shall be paid by the applicant, whether the final decision is in his favor or not.
20. lappuse - Whenever an application is made for a patent which, in the opinion of the commissioner, would interfere with any pending application, or with any unexpired patent, he shall give notice thereof to the applicants, or applicant and patentee, as the case may be, and shall direct the primary examiner to proceed to determine the question of priority of invention. And the commissioner may issue a patent to the party who is adjudged the prior inventor...
48. lappuse - ... notice with the Commissioner that he elects to have all further proceedings conducted as provided in section 146 of this title.
20. lappuse - If any applicant is dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Appeals, he may appeal to the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, in which case he waives his right to proceed under section 63 of this title.
26. lappuse - You are hereby notified of my appeal to the US Court of Customs and Patent Appeals from the decisions of the board of appeals, rendered on or about the . day of , 19 . . . , rejecting my above-entitled application and refusing me a patent for the invention set forth therein.
48. lappuse - Appeals, provided that such appeal shall be dismissed if any adverse party to such interference shall, within twenty days after the appellant shall have filed notice of appeal according to section 60 of this title, file notice with the Commissioner of Patents that he elects to have all further proceedings conducted as provided in section 63.
30. lappuse - Upon principle and authority, therefore, it must be laid down as a rule that where the question decided in the Patent Office is one between contesting parties as to priority of invention, the decision there made must be accepted as controlling upon that question of fact in any subsequent suit between the same parties, unless the contrary is established by testimony which in character and amount carries thorough conviction.