Modern Liberty: And the Limits of Government (Issues of Our Time)W. W. Norton & Company, 2011. gada 7. febr. - 224 lappuses “An erudite, sharp-tongued libertarian, eager to do battle with censors, regulators ... and sanctimonious busybodies of every stripe.”—New York Times In this impassioned defense of liberty, renowned Harvard law professor Charles Fried argues that the seemingly unimpeachable goals of equality and community are often the most potent rivals of freedom. Declared a “spirited, sophisticated manifesto” by the New York Times Book Review, Modern Liberty demonstrates how the dense tangle of government regulations both supports and threatens our personal liberties. Armed with Fried’s insights, readers will be better able to defend themselves against those on both the left and the right who would, even with the best intentions, restrict their liberty. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 43.
3. lappuse
... moved to reason together with these authors , or to argue with them , they are sure to leave your views tested , if not changed . The perspectives of the authors in this series are diverse , the voices are dis- tinctive , the issues are ...
... moved to reason together with these authors , or to argue with them , they are sure to leave your views tested , if not changed . The perspectives of the authors in this series are diverse , the voices are dis- tinctive , the issues are ...
19. lappuse
... move through these entities, and when they are gone the entities are still there—though changed in large or imperceptible degrees by the persons who have moved through them . Liberty: The Very Idea 19.
... move through these entities, and when they are gone the entities are still there—though changed in large or imperceptible degrees by the persons who have moved through them . Liberty: The Very Idea 19.
20. lappuse
Charles Fried. degrees by the persons who have moved through them . But the individual is primary in the sense that only individuals have eyes , ears , mouths , hands , and brains , and it is only by individuals mak- ing , saying ...
Charles Fried. degrees by the persons who have moved through them . But the individual is primary in the sense that only individuals have eyes , ears , mouths , hands , and brains , and it is only by individuals mak- ing , saying ...
24. lappuse
... move and frog - marching him . ) In cooperation we elicit choices by inviting the other to join in our choices , to make our choices his . Cooperation can be made to look like coercion - the offer you cannot refuse . 10 Take an extreme ...
... move and frog - marching him . ) In cooperation we elicit choices by inviting the other to join in our choices , to make our choices his . Cooperation can be made to look like coercion - the offer you cannot refuse . 10 Take an extreme ...
25. lappuse
... moved to Quebec, because he was classified as a French-speaking parent. They decided to home-school the boy. A grandmother was unable to place a catalogue order for a talking doll to be shipped to her six-year-old grandchild, who lived ...
... moved to Quebec, because he was classified as a French-speaking parent. They decided to home-school the boy. A grandmother was unable to place a catalogue order for a talking doll to be shipped to her six-year-old grandchild, who lived ...
Saturs
11 | |
Liberty and Its Competitors | 41 |
Liberty and Rights | 65 |
Liberty of the Mind | 95 |
Sex | 124 |
Back to Work | 144 |
The Spirit of Liberty | 162 |
Notes | 185 |
203 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Modern Liberty: And the Limits of Government (Issues of Our Time) Charles Fried Priekšskatījums nav pieejams - 2007 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
Active Liberty allow Amartya Sen argue argument beauty Benjamin Constant Cambridge Cass Sunstein CHAPTER Charles Fried chess choices choose citizens claim Constitution democracy democratic depends dissenters economic enjoy equality erty example force free speech freedom French Language glory goals Harvard University Harvard University Press Health Canada human idea ideal Immanuel Kant impose impositions income individual inequality John Rawls judge judgment justice Kant kind liberal lives Mass ment mind modern moral move Murphy and Nagel Myth of Ownership National natural right objection one’s parents people’s person Pol Pot political property and contract protect Quebec reason regime respect Robert Nozick rules secure self-ownership sense sexual social society speak spirit of liberty Stephen Breyer Sunstein things Thomas Nagel thought tion trans Vermont violate Wal-Mart wealth women York