Modern Liberty: And the Limits of Government (Issues of Our Time)W. W. Norton & Company, 2011. gada 7. febr. - 224 lappuses “An erudite, sharp-tongued libertarian, eager to do battle with censors, regulators ... and sanctimonious busybodies of every stripe.”—New York Times In this impassioned defense of liberty, renowned Harvard law professor Charles Fried argues that the seemingly unimpeachable goals of equality and community are often the most potent rivals of freedom. Declared a “spirited, sophisticated manifesto” by the New York Times Book Review, Modern Liberty demonstrates how the dense tangle of government regulations both supports and threatens our personal liberties. Armed with Fried’s insights, readers will be better able to defend themselves against those on both the left and the right who would, even with the best intentions, restrict their liberty. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 45.
16. lappuse
... choosing hemlock over exile from Athens ) , but Constant saw that this “ liberty ” often goes along with the total , Spartan annihilation of the individual . “ It makes the indi- vidual a slave so that the people might be free . " 4 In ...
... choosing hemlock over exile from Athens ) , but Constant saw that this “ liberty ” often goes along with the total , Spartan annihilation of the individual . “ It makes the indi- vidual a slave so that the people might be free . " 4 In ...
20. lappuse
... my choices may be influenced by prejudice , emotion , fear of others , it is still I who must choose before I act . And the beliefs , choices , and actions that make up the human world are those of individuals 20 20 MODERN LIBERTY.
... my choices may be influenced by prejudice , emotion , fear of others , it is still I who must choose before I act . And the beliefs , choices , and actions that make up the human world are those of individuals 20 20 MODERN LIBERTY.
21. lappuse
... choose the good of humanity or the production of great beauty because of the satisfaction it procures for me ; I feel the satisfaction ( or dejection ) because these things are good in them- selves . If by some magic I had to choose ...
... choose the good of humanity or the production of great beauty because of the satisfaction it procures for me ; I feel the satisfaction ( or dejection ) because these things are good in them- selves . If by some magic I had to choose ...
22. lappuse
Charles Fried. chooses as he does , does not determine the judgment on what he does . He is responsible for his beliefs ... choosing individual , but in doing something to me they acknowledge that fact and use it for their own purposes ...
Charles Fried. chooses as he does , does not determine the judgment on what he does . He is responsible for his beliefs ... choosing individual , but in doing something to me they acknowledge that fact and use it for their own purposes ...
23. lappuse
... choosing beings: as persons, as individuals (perhaps not in our conception and infancy, but soon after that). So all ... choose. Liberty is implicated when we take those capacities into account. Consider two opposite ways in which we ...
... choosing beings: as persons, as individuals (perhaps not in our conception and infancy, but soon after that). So all ... choose. Liberty is implicated when we take those capacities into account. Consider two opposite ways in which we ...
Saturs
11 | |
Liberty and Its Competitors | 41 |
Liberty and Rights | 65 |
Liberty of the Mind | 95 |
Sex | 124 |
Back to Work | 144 |
The Spirit of Liberty | 162 |
Notes | 185 |
203 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Modern Liberty: And the Limits of Government (Issues of Our Time) Charles Fried Priekšskatījums nav pieejams - 2007 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
Active Liberty allow Amartya Sen argue argument beauty Benjamin Constant Cambridge Cass Sunstein CHAPTER Charles Fried chess choices choose citizens claim Constitution democracy democratic depends dissenters economic enjoy equality erty example force free speech freedom French Language glory goals Harvard University Harvard University Press Health Canada human idea ideal Immanuel Kant impose impositions income individual inequality John Rawls judge judgment justice Kant kind liberal lives Mass ment mind modern moral move Murphy and Nagel Myth of Ownership National natural right objection one’s parents people’s person Pol Pot political property and contract protect Quebec reason regime respect Robert Nozick rules secure self-ownership sense sexual social society speak spirit of liberty Stephen Breyer Sunstein things Thomas Nagel thought tion trans Vermont violate Wal-Mart wealth women York