Modern Liberty: And the Limits of Government (Issues of Our Time)W. W. Norton & Company, 2011. gada 7. febr. - 224 lappuses An erudite, sharp-tongued libertarian, eager to do battle with censors, regulators ... and sanctimonious busybodies of every stripe.New York Times In this impassioned defense of liberty, renowned Harvard law professor Charles Fried argues that the seemingly unimpeachable goals of equality and community are often the most potent rivals of freedom. Declared a spirited, sophisticated manifesto by the New York Times Book Review, Modern Liberty demonstrates how the dense tangle of government regulations both supports and threatens our personal liberties. Armed with Frieds insights, readers will be better able to defend themselves against those on both the left and the right who would, even with the best intentions, restrict their liberty. |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 7.
111. lappuse
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
190. lappuse
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
191. lappuse
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
194. lappuse
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
199. lappuse
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots..
Saturs
11 | |
Liberty and Its Competitors | 41 |
Liberty and Rights | 65 |
Liberty of the Mind | 95 |
Sex | 124 |
Back to Work | 144 |
The Spirit of Liberty | 162 |
Notes | 185 |
203 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Modern Liberty: And the Limits of Government (Issues of Our Time) Charles Fried Priekšskatījums nav pieejams - 2007 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
Active Liberty allow Amartya Sen argue argument beauty Benjamin Constant Cambridge Cass Sunstein Chapter Charles Fried chess choices choose citizens claim Constitution democracy democratic depends dissenters economic enjoy equality erty example force freedom French Language glory goals governments Harvard University Harvard University Press Health Canada human idea ideal Immanuel Kant impose impositions income inequality John Rawls judge judgment justice Kant kind liberal lives mans Mass ment mind modern moral move Murphy and Nagel Myth of Ownership National natural right objection ones parents peoples person Pol Pot political property and contract protect Quebec reason regime respect Robert Nozick rules secure self-ownership sense sexual social society speak Speakers spirit of liberty Stephen Breyer Sunstein things Thomas Nagel thought tion trans Vermont violate Wal-Mart wealth women York