Art and CopyrightBloomsbury Academic, 2001. gada 1. jūn. - 216 lappuses The intellectual property protection afforded to works of art is receiving increased attention by artists,museums, galleries, auction houses, publishers and their professional staff and legal advisors, as well as by those teaching or studying copyright and/or the law of cultural property. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 21.
... F 2d 411 .123 , 177 ..70 ( 2d Cir 1987 ) .. ............ 57 Carter v Melmsley Spear Inc 861 F Supp 303 ( SDNY 1994 ) 71 F 3d 77 ( 2d Cir 1995 ) .... ........................ .. ..76 CBS Records Australia Ltd v Telmark Teleproducts ...
... F 2d 1103 1108 ( 5th Cir 1991 ) . LB ( Plastics ) Ltd v Swish Products Ltd [ 1979 ] RPC 551 . Lee v A. R. T. Co 125 F. 3d 580 ( 7th Cir . 1997 ) ............ Leibovitz v Paramount Pictures Corp 137 F 3d 109 116 ( 2d Cir 1998 ) ..... .14 ...
... F 2d 119 ( 1930 ) Nottinghamshire Healthcare v News Group Newspapers [ 2002 ] EWCA 409 ....... Norowzian v Arks Ltd ... F. Supp 2d 216 ( NYDC 2000 ) .......... 229 Peter Pan Fabrics Inc v Martin Weiner Corp 274 F 2d 487 489 ( 2d Cir 1960 ) ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Its Justification and History | 9 |
The Modern Law of Copyright | 27 |
Autortiesības | |
11 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.