...matter had been before it de novo. * * * Congress has merely made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a Board decision when...the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view. The Court thus concluded that the judicial review provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act and...

...had the matter been before it de novo. Congress has merely made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a Board decision when...including the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view.10 The Universal Camera case involved the further question of whether, in reviewing a decision...

...National Labor Relations Board. It said: "Congress has merely made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a Board decision when it cannot conscientiously gind that the evidence supporting that decision is substantial, when viewed in the light that the record...

...opinion, 340 US 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456, saying, "We there said that while the 'reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a Board decision when...the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view,' it may not 'displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court...

...setting aside a board's decision when it cannot conscientiously find that the evidence supporting it is substantial, when viewed in the light that the...the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view." At page 490 of 340 US, at page 465 of 71 S. Ct, the court further said : "We should fail in our duty...

...had the matter been before it de novo. Congress has merely made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a board decision when...the body of evidence opposed to the board's view." The provision of the pending bill that the review before a court of appeals of a decision of the Administrator...

...substantial evidence "on the record considered as a whole," Congress made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a Board decision when...the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view. Pp. 487-488. 3. When read in the light of their legislative history, the Administrative Procedure Act...

...had the matter been before it de novo. Congress has merely made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a board decision when...the body of evidence opposed to the board's view." The provision of the pending bill that the review before a court of appeals of a decision of the Administrator...

...had the matter been before it de novo. Congress has merely made it clear that a reviewing court is not barred from setting aside a Board decision when...the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view. There remains, then, the question whether enactment of these two statutes has altered the scope of...

...in such cases, but nevertheless made it clear that they were to examine Board findings and decisions “in the light that the record in its entirety furnishes...the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view.” The Supreme dourt also held that on review of Board orders, trial examiner's recommendations which...