Text: The Genealogy of an Antidisciplinary ObjectDuke University Press, 1992 - 245 lappuses The concept of textuality in recent decades has come to designate a fundamentally contested terrain within a number of academic disciplines. How it came to occupy this position is the subject of John Mowitt's book, a critical genealogy of the social and intellectual conditions that contributed to the emergence of the textual object. Beginning with theTel Quelgroup in France in the sixties and seventies, Mowitt's study details how a certain interdisciplinary crisis prompted academics to rethink the conditions of cultural interpretation. Concentrating on three disciplinary projects—literary analysis, film studies, and musicology—Mowitt shows how textuality's emergence called into question not merely the relations among these disciplines, but also the cultural logic of disciplinary reason as such. At once an effort to define "the text" and to explore and extend the theory of textuality, this book illustrates why the notion of interdisciplinary research has recently acquired such urgency. At the same time, by emphasizing the genealogical dimension of the textual object, Mowitt raises the issues of its "antidisciplinary" character, and by extension its immediate pertinence for the current debates over multiculturalism and Eurocentrism. Innovative, historically astute and theoretically informed, this important book will be indispensable reading for all scholars in literary and cultural studies. |
Saturs
Textuality and the Critique of Disciplinary Reason | 23 |
The Text Goes Pop | 48 |
3 | 83 |
Autortiesības | |
5 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
academic actually analysis appear approach argue articulation associate attempt Barthes Barthes's becomes Bellour called character codes concept concerns constituted context course critical critique cultural defined Derrida designate disciplinary discipline discourse discussion distinction domain effect Eisenstein elaboration emergence enables engage essay example explicitly extent fact fashion field figure film filmic force formulation function historical human important insistence institutional intellectual interests issue knowledge Kristeva language later linguistic literary literature Marxism mass material meaning Metz namely nevertheless notion object once opening organized particular perhaps pleasure political position practice precisely present problematic production public sphere question reading refers reflection relation remains resistance Ropars seeks sense separation SHOT signifying simply situate social space specifically structure struggle suggested text's textuality theoretical theory tion tradition trans writing York
Atsauces uz šo grāmatu
Writing Cogito: Montaigne, Descartes, and the Institution of the Modern Subject Hassan Melehy Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 1997 |