Art and CopyrightBloomsbury Publishing, 2021. gada 11. marts - 336 lappuses First published in 2001, Art and Copyright has established itself as a leading text in the field. Revised and updated, this third edition includes additional coverage of the following topics: - The relationship between designs law and artistic works; - EU and Brexit developments; - AI-created works; - graffiti and other non-conventional works; - blockchain and rights management; - orphan works; - new exceptions to copyright; and - digital copyright, art databases and online platforms. This book remains an invaluable work for all those involved in art law and for intellectual property lawyers involved with the exploitation and/or sale of artistic works, as well as for intellectual property academics, researchers, law students, curators, publishers, artists, gallery owners, auction houses, and those developing and running online art platforms, databases and technology to transact in art. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 89.
viii. lappuse
... Limited and Others (1991) ................................................................................... 80 4.2 ... Limited (2012) .............. 83 4.2.7. Conclusion: Derogatory Treatment in UK Law ...
... Limited and Others (1991) ................................................................................... 80 4.2 ... Limited (2012) .............. 83 4.2.7. Conclusion: Derogatory Treatment in UK Law ...
2. lappuse
... limited protection to the fine arts, but in 1902 protection was extended to sculptors and decorative designers, irrespective of the merit of their work. The quality of the work can also be relevant in US law: see, eg, L Bently and B ...
... limited protection to the fine arts, but in 1902 protection was extended to sculptors and decorative designers, irrespective of the merit of their work. The quality of the work can also be relevant in US law: see, eg, L Bently and B ...
4. lappuse
... limited company; in contrast, civil law 'authors' rights' systems have tended to emphasise the individual creator of the work and do not as a rule consider legal entities to be eligible as 'authors' – only an individual can be an author ...
... limited company; in contrast, civil law 'authors' rights' systems have tended to emphasise the individual creator of the work and do not as a rule consider legal entities to be eligible as 'authors' – only an individual can be an author ...
5. lappuse
... limited exceptions to this rule: eg, pre-CDPA photographs. See Copinger (above n 15) para 5-02. 22 S 202: 'Ownership of a copyright ... is distinct from ownership of any material object in which the work is embodied.' This section was ...
... limited exceptions to this rule: eg, pre-CDPA photographs. See Copinger (above n 15) para 5-02. 22 S 202: 'Ownership of a copyright ... is distinct from ownership of any material object in which the work is embodied.' This section was ...
10. lappuse
... limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their Writings and Discoveries'.13 Putting it another way, the economic rationale for copyright has both a 'static' and 'dynamic' element: 'static' in that the owner has a ...
... limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their Writings and Discoveries'.13 Putting it another way, the economic rationale for copyright has both a 'static' and 'dynamic' element: 'static' in that the owner has a ...
Saturs
1 | |
8 | |
3 The Modern Law of Copyright | 24 |
4 Moral Rights and Artists Resale Right Droit de Suite | 72 |
Copyright Related Rights and Digitisation | 98 |
6 Some Current Issues | 126 |
7 Some Practical Issues and Precedents | 196 |
8 Art and Intellectual Property Rights Other than Copyright | 218 |
9 Conclusion | 229 |
Precedents and Precedent Checklists | 236 |
Index | 247 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
accessed According appears apply approach argued argument artistic basis benefit CDPA chapter cited CJEU claim collecting communication concerned considered context copy copyright law copyright protection Court created creation creative cultural database dealing defendant developed Digital Directive discussed economic effect European example exception expression fair give granted held idea images infringement Intellectual Property interest International Internet involved issues judge judgment labour licence limited London Lord material matter means moral rights noted object original orphan owner Oxford painting parody particular Performances person photographs Practice Press prevent protected by copyright public domain Publishing question recent referred Regulations relation relevant reproduction Resale Right Review sculpture Society substantial tion trade mark traditional UK law United University visual