Art and CopyrightBloomsbury Publishing, 2021. gada 11. marts - 336 lappuses First published in 2001, Art and Copyright has established itself as a leading text in the field. Revised and updated, this third edition includes additional coverage of the following topics: - The relationship between designs law and artistic works; - EU and Brexit developments; - AI-created works; - graffiti and other non-conventional works; - blockchain and rights management; - orphan works; - new exceptions to copyright; and - digital copyright, art databases and online platforms. This book remains an invaluable work for all those involved in art law and for intellectual property lawyers involved with the exploitation and/or sale of artistic works, as well as for intellectual property academics, researchers, law students, curators, publishers, artists, gallery owners, auction houses, and those developing and running online art platforms, databases and technology to transact in art. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 56.
xxi. lappuse
... ) Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright (Judgment) [2015] EUECJ C-419/13, EU:C:2015:27 ..................................................................47–48 BestWater International (Order) French Text [2014] EUECJ C ...
... ) Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright (Judgment) [2015] EUECJ C-419/13, EU:C:2015:27 ..................................................................47–48 BestWater International (Order) French Text [2014] EUECJ C ...
xxii. lappuse
... , 128, 135, 139, 158, 161, 163, 166, 186, 233 Innoweb (Judgment of the Court) [2013] EUECJ C-202/12, EU:C:2013:850 ..............116 Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV C-310/17, EU:C:2018:899 ...........................................
... , 128, 135, 139, 158, 161, 163, 166, 186, 233 Innoweb (Judgment of the Court) [2013] EUECJ C-202/12, EU:C:2013:850 ..............116 Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV C-310/17, EU:C:2018:899 ...........................................
xxxii. lappuse
... judgment of 19 April 1961, JCP 111N 12183 (1961) ............76 Waiting for Godot TGI, Paris, 3e ch, RIDA, 1993, 155 ... judgment of 16 June 1991, I ZR 24/92, GRUR 1994, 798, BGH ...
... judgment of 19 April 1961, JCP 111N 12183 (1961) ............76 Waiting for Godot TGI, Paris, 3e ch, RIDA, 1993, 155 ... judgment of 16 June 1991, I ZR 24/92, GRUR 1994, 798, BGH ...
6. lappuse
... judgements and varying assumptions about the function of copyright remain important currents, albeit not always stated ones, in copyright law.27 So. 26 Professor Sterling speaks of the 'self-contained' approach in his World Copyright Law ...
... judgements and varying assumptions about the function of copyright remain important currents, albeit not always stated ones, in copyright law.27 So. 26 Professor Sterling speaks of the 'self-contained' approach in his World Copyright Law ...
14. lappuse
... judgment in Millar v Taylor mingles both the economic and personal rights of the author: 'In his presentation, the claims of propriety and property reinforced and validated each other: the personal interests moralised the economic claim ...
... judgment in Millar v Taylor mingles both the economic and personal rights of the author: 'In his presentation, the claims of propriety and property reinforced and validated each other: the personal interests moralised the economic claim ...
Saturs
1 | |
8 | |
3 The Modern Law of Copyright | 24 |
4 Moral Rights and Artists Resale Right Droit de Suite | 72 |
Copyright Related Rights and Digitisation | 98 |
6 Some Current Issues | 126 |
7 Some Practical Issues and Precedents | 196 |
8 Art and Intellectual Property Rights Other than Copyright | 218 |
9 Conclusion | 229 |
Precedents and Precedent Checklists | 236 |
Index | 247 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
accessed According appears apply approach argued argument artistic basis benefit CDPA chapter cited CJEU claim collecting communication concerned considered context copy copyright law copyright protection Court created creation creative cultural database dealing defendant developed Digital Directive discussed economic effect European example exception expression fair give granted held idea images infringement Intellectual Property interest International Internet involved issues judge judgment labour licence limited London Lord material matter means moral rights noted object original orphan owner Oxford painting parody particular Performances person photographs Practice Press prevent protected by copyright public domain Publishing question recent referred Regulations relation relevant reproduction Resale Right Review sculpture Society substantial tion trade mark traditional UK law United University visual