Art and CopyrightBloomsbury Publishing, 2021. gada 11. marts - 336 lappuses First published in 2001, Art and Copyright has established itself as a leading text in the field. Revised and updated, this third edition includes additional coverage of the following topics: - The relationship between designs law and artistic works; - EU and Brexit developments; - AI-created works; - graffiti and other non-conventional works; - blockchain and rights management; - orphan works; - new exceptions to copyright; and - digital copyright, art databases and online platforms. This book remains an invaluable work for all those involved in art law and for intellectual property lawyers involved with the exploitation and/or sale of artistic works, as well as for intellectual property academics, researchers, law students, curators, publishers, artists, gallery owners, auction houses, and those developing and running online art platforms, databases and technology to transact in art. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 53.
v. lappuse
... idea of a third edition and for her help and encouragement throughout. I am also grateful to those readers who have told me a third edition would be a good idea. The book has also benefited from the author's work as a practising lawyer ...
... idea of a third edition and for her help and encouragement throughout. I am also grateful to those readers who have told me a third edition would be a good idea. The book has also benefited from the author's work as a practising lawyer ...
vii. lappuse
... ............ 3.2.8. Economic Rights and the Idea/Expression Dichotomy .....................47 3.2.9. Exceptions/Defences to Copyright Infringement .............................. 3.2.10. Industrial Designs ............................
... ............ 3.2.8. Economic Rights and the Idea/Expression Dichotomy .....................47 3.2.9. Exceptions/Defences to Copyright Infringement .............................. 3.2.10. Industrial Designs ............................
xi. lappuse
... ................................230 9.2. Appropriating the Public Domain: Idea Versus Expression .........................232 9.3. Art, Technology and the Future ...............................................................
... ................................230 9.2. Appropriating the Public Domain: Idea Versus Expression .........................232 9.3. Art, Technology and the Future ...............................................................
xviii. lappuse
... Idea of Authorship in Copyright (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2007) Zemer II. Journals/Information Resources ARTL Art, Antiquity and Law (Institute of Art and Law, Builth Wells) EIPR ENT LR European Intellectual Property Review (Sweet & Maxwell) ...
... Idea of Authorship in Copyright (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2007) Zemer II. Journals/Information Resources ARTL Art, Antiquity and Law (Institute of Art and Law, Builth Wells) EIPR ENT LR European Intellectual Property Review (Sweet & Maxwell) ...
4. lappuse
... idea/ expression dichotomy' in copyright law.18 Simply put, copyright does not protect ideas, only the form in which they are expressed. As Lord Salmon once put it, 'It is trite law that there can be no copyright in an idea.'19 So for ...
... idea/ expression dichotomy' in copyright law.18 Simply put, copyright does not protect ideas, only the form in which they are expressed. As Lord Salmon once put it, 'It is trite law that there can be no copyright in an idea.'19 So for ...
Saturs
1 | |
8 | |
3 The Modern Law of Copyright | 24 |
4 Moral Rights and Artists Resale Right Droit de Suite | 72 |
Copyright Related Rights and Digitisation | 98 |
6 Some Current Issues | 126 |
7 Some Practical Issues and Precedents | 196 |
8 Art and Intellectual Property Rights Other than Copyright | 218 |
9 Conclusion | 229 |
Precedents and Precedent Checklists | 236 |
Index | 247 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
accessed According appears apply approach argued argument artistic basis benefit CDPA chapter cited CJEU claim collecting communication concerned considered context copy copyright law copyright protection Court created creation creative cultural database dealing defendant developed Digital Directive discussed economic effect European example exception expression fair give granted held idea images infringement Intellectual Property interest International Internet involved issues judge judgment labour licence limited London Lord material matter means moral rights noted object original orphan owner Oxford painting parody particular Performances person photographs Practice Press prevent protected by copyright public domain Publishing question recent referred Regulations relation relevant reproduction Resale Right Review sculpture Society substantial tion trade mark traditional UK law United University visual