Art and CopyrightBloomsbury Publishing, 2021. gada 11. marts - 336 lappuses First published in 2001, Art and Copyright has established itself as a leading text in the field. Revised and updated, this third edition includes additional coverage of the following topics: - The relationship between designs law and artistic works; - EU and Brexit developments; - AI-created works; - graffiti and other non-conventional works; - blockchain and rights management; - orphan works; - new exceptions to copyright; and - digital copyright, art databases and online platforms. This book remains an invaluable work for all those involved in art law and for intellectual property lawyers involved with the exploitation and/or sale of artistic works, as well as for intellectual property academics, researchers, law students, curators, publishers, artists, gallery owners, auction houses, and those developing and running online art platforms, databases and technology to transact in art. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 45.
i. lappuse
... exceptions to copyright; and – digital copyright, art databases and online platforms. This book remains an invaluable work for all those involved in art law and for intellectual property lawyers involved with the exploitation and/or ...
... exceptions to copyright; and – digital copyright, art databases and online platforms. This book remains an invaluable work for all those involved in art law and for intellectual property lawyers involved with the exploitation and/or ...
vii. lappuse
... Idea/Expression Dichotomy .....................47 3.2.9. Exceptions/Defences to Copyright Infringement .............................. 3.2.10. Industrial Designs ..........................................................
... Idea/Expression Dichotomy .....................47 3.2.9. Exceptions/Defences to Copyright Infringement .............................. 3.2.10. Industrial Designs ..........................................................
1. lappuse
... exceptions, UK copyright law now makes no express distinction between works of fine art and other artistic works in affording copyright protection. But historically, a distinction between the fine arts and the applied arts was ...
... exceptions, UK copyright law now makes no express distinction between works of fine art and other artistic works in affording copyright protection. But historically, a distinction between the fine arts and the applied arts was ...
4. lappuse
... exceptions, sufficient to confer 'originality', whereas under authors' rights systems there had to be creativity, on the basis a work reflects the personality of its creator. However, CJEU case law now means 'sweat of the brow' has been ...
... exceptions, sufficient to confer 'originality', whereas under authors' rights systems there had to be creativity, on the basis a work reflects the personality of its creator. However, CJEU case law now means 'sweat of the brow' has been ...
5. lappuse
... exceptions to this rule: eg, pre-CDPA photographs. See Copinger (above n 15) para 5-02. 22 S 202: 'Ownership of a copyright ... is distinct from ownership of any material object in which the work is embodied.' This section was ...
... exceptions to this rule: eg, pre-CDPA photographs. See Copinger (above n 15) para 5-02. 22 S 202: 'Ownership of a copyright ... is distinct from ownership of any material object in which the work is embodied.' This section was ...
Saturs
1 | |
8 | |
3 The Modern Law of Copyright | 24 |
4 Moral Rights and Artists Resale Right Droit de Suite | 72 |
Copyright Related Rights and Digitisation | 98 |
6 Some Current Issues | 126 |
7 Some Practical Issues and Precedents | 196 |
8 Art and Intellectual Property Rights Other than Copyright | 218 |
9 Conclusion | 229 |
Precedents and Precedent Checklists | 236 |
Index | 247 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
accessed According appears apply approach argued argument artistic basis benefit CDPA chapter cited CJEU claim collecting communication concerned considered context copy copyright law copyright protection Court created creation creative cultural database dealing defendant developed Digital Directive discussed economic effect European example exception expression fair give granted held idea images infringement Intellectual Property interest International Internet involved issues judge judgment labour licence limited London Lord material matter means moral rights noted object original orphan owner Oxford painting parody particular Performances person photographs Practice Press prevent protected by copyright public domain Publishing question recent referred Regulations relation relevant reproduction Resale Right Review sculpture Society substantial tion trade mark traditional UK law United University visual