Art and CopyrightBloomsbury Publishing, 2021. gada 11. marts - 336 lappuses First published in 2001, Art and Copyright has established itself as a leading text in the field. Revised and updated, this third edition includes additional coverage of the following topics: - The relationship between designs law and artistic works; - EU and Brexit developments; - AI-created works; - graffiti and other non-conventional works; - blockchain and rights management; - orphan works; - new exceptions to copyright; and - digital copyright, art databases and online platforms. This book remains an invaluable work for all those involved in art law and for intellectual property lawyers involved with the exploitation and/or sale of artistic works, as well as for intellectual property academics, researchers, law students, curators, publishers, artists, gallery owners, auction houses, and those developing and running online art platforms, databases and technology to transact in art. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 85.
v. lappuse
... Court of Justice of the European Union. There has also been a growth in scholarly writing on this area (including on the history of artistic copyright) which the author has alluded to. Artistic copyright is a fascinating area – of ever ...
... Court of Justice of the European Union. There has also been a growth in scholarly writing on this area (including on the history of artistic copyright) which the author has alluded to. Artistic copyright is a fascinating area – of ever ...
xxii. lappuse
... 135, 139, 158, 161, 163, 166, 186, 233 Innoweb (Judgment of the Court) [2013] EUECJ C-202/12, EU:C:2013:850 ..............116 Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV C-310/17, EU:C:2018:899 ..............................................
... 135, 139, 158, 161, 163, 166, 186, 233 Innoweb (Judgment of the Court) [2013] EUECJ C-202/12, EU:C:2013:850 ..............116 Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV C-310/17, EU:C:2018:899 ..............................................
xxvii. lappuse
... 132 Hi-Tech Autoparts Ltd v Towergate Two Ltd [2002] FSR 15 & 16 (Patents County Court) .................................................................................... 31, 62, 232 Holman v Johnson (1775) 1 Cowp 341 ...
... 132 Hi-Tech Autoparts Ltd v Towergate Two Ltd [2002] FSR 15 & 16 (Patents County Court) .................................................................................... 31, 62, 232 Holman v Johnson (1775) 1 Cowp 341 ...
xxix. lappuse
... (RZx) Feb. 4, 2013 (US District Court, CD California) .......................................................168 Morrison Leahy Music Ltd and Another v Lightbond Ltd and Others [1993] EMLR 144 (ChD) ....................
... (RZx) Feb. 4, 2013 (US District Court, CD California) .......................................................168 Morrison Leahy Music Ltd and Another v Lightbond Ltd and Others [1993] EMLR 144 (ChD) ....................
xxxii. lappuse
... , OGH (Austrian Supreme Court), 10 July 2001, GRUR Int 2002, 452, IIC 2003, 223 ......................................................114 Copyright Collecting Society, Re, 23 November 1999, [2000] EIPR N-63 (Austrian Supreme Ct) ......
... , OGH (Austrian Supreme Court), 10 July 2001, GRUR Int 2002, 452, IIC 2003, 223 ......................................................114 Copyright Collecting Society, Re, 23 November 1999, [2000] EIPR N-63 (Austrian Supreme Ct) ......
Saturs
1 | |
8 | |
3 The Modern Law of Copyright | 24 |
4 Moral Rights and Artists Resale Right Droit de Suite | 72 |
Copyright Related Rights and Digitisation | 98 |
6 Some Current Issues | 126 |
7 Some Practical Issues and Precedents | 196 |
8 Art and Intellectual Property Rights Other than Copyright | 218 |
9 Conclusion | 229 |
Precedents and Precedent Checklists | 236 |
Index | 247 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
accessed According appears apply approach argued argument artistic basis benefit CDPA chapter cited CJEU claim collecting communication concerned considered context copy copyright law copyright protection Court created creation creative cultural database dealing defendant developed Digital Directive discussed economic effect European example exception expression fair give granted held idea images infringement Intellectual Property interest International Internet involved issues judge judgment labour licence limited London Lord material matter means moral rights noted object original orphan owner Oxford painting parody particular Performances person photographs Practice Press prevent protected by copyright public domain Publishing question recent referred Regulations relation relevant reproduction Resale Right Review sculpture Society substantial tion trade mark traditional UK law United University visual