Social Agency: Dilemmas and Education Praxiology

Pirmais vāks
Wojciech W. Gasparski, Marek Krzysztof Mlicki, Bela H. Banathy
Transaction Publishers - 351 lappuses
Praxiology deals with doing and working from the point of view of effectiveness. It has three components: analysis of concepts involving purposive actions; critique of models of action from the viewpoint of efficiency; and normative advisory aspects in recommendations for increasing human efficiency. This fourth volume of the Praxiology series is devoted to the very special topic of social agency. It focuses on two important praxiological concepts: rationality and preparation as preconditions for human action to be effective and efficient. The question of efficiency was raised by Anatol Rapoport over three decades ago in his lecture to the audience at the Praxiological Seminar in Warsaw in 1961. Social Agency begins with an article written by this same famous scholar on the topic of decision theory, "Social Dilemmas: A Historical Overview." Social dilemmas is the subject of the first part of this volume, a question related to studies on human action guided by two types of rationality: individual and collective rationality. The intersection of the two, in which individuals meet collectives, creates the situation in which social agency emerges, generating dilemmatic circumstances for the actors involved. The articles collected in the second part explore praxiological dimensions of education aimed toward the knowledge society, because of knowledge possessed and produced by educated persons. Chapters and contributors to volume 4 include: "Five Questions on the Research on Social Dilemmas" by Marek K. Mlicki; "Psychological Processes Underlying Cooperation in Social Dilemmas" by Paul A. M. Van Lange and David M. Messick; "Designing a System for Design Learning: Designers and/or Learners?" by Arne Collen; "Creating an Evolutionary Image of New Systems of Learning and Human Development" by Janet A. Khan; and "A Study Program Design in Retrospect" by Stig C. Holmberg. Social Agency continues the trend of original research done in a little-known, but important area. Social scientists, policymakers, and educators will benefit from this work.

No grāmatas satura

Atlasītās lappuses

Saturs

Rationality of and Preparation for Action
1
Introduction
13
Marek K Mlicki
79
A Historical Overview
90
The Controversy about the Evolution of Cooperation
113
Volunteers Dilemma and Efficiency of Action
139
17
147
Overcoming
157
Creating an Evolutionary Image of New Systems
195
A Design Process
233
A Canadian Example
263
A Methodology for Use of Systems Thinking and Redesign
273
A Study Program Design in Retrospect
291
Curriculum in Action
309
Facilitation
323
Autortiesības

Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu

Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes

Populāri fragmenti

49. lappuse - unless the number of individuals in a group is quite small, or unless there is coercion or some other special device to make individuals act in their common interest, rational, self-interested individuals will not act to achieve their common or group interest.
4. lappuse - The body of economic knowledge is an essential element in the structure of human civilization; it is the foundation upon which modern industrialism and all the moral, intellectual, technological, and therapeutical achievements of the last centuries have been built. It rests with men whether they will make the proper use of the rich treasure with which this knowledge provides them or whether they will leave it unused. But if they fail to take the best advantage of it and disregard its teachings and...
110. lappuse - Messick, DM, Allison, ST, & Samuelson, CD (1988). Framing and communication effects on group members' responses to environmental and social uncertainty. In S. Maital (Ed.), Applied behavioral economics (Vol.
49. lappuse - ... still not voluntarily act to achieve that common or group interest. The notion that groups of individuals will act to achieve their common or group interests, far from being a logical implication of the assumption that the individuals in a group will rationally further their individual interests, is in fact inconsistent with that assumption.
198. lappuse - Why was I not warned? Why was I not better educated? Why did my teachers not tell me about the problems and help me understand I was a member of an interdependent human race?" With even greater anger the student shouted, "You helped me extend my hands with incredible machines, my eyes with telescopes and microscopes, my ears with telephones, radios, and sonar, my brain with computers, but...
330. lappuse - That means that the statements made are systematically challenged in order to expose them to the viewpoints of the different sides, and the structure of the process becomes one of alternating steps on the micro-level; that means the generation of solution specifications toward end statements and subjecting them to discussion of their pros and cons.
109. lappuse - G. and Galili, R. (1993). Constructive intergroup competition as a solution to the free rider problem: a field experiment.
94. lappuse - ... create severe societal problems. Also, meetings at work would be considerably more productive if all people invest sufficient time and effort in preparing for these meetings. And close partners too, face social dilemmas, such as whether or not one should spend less time with one's independent friends. In a sense, social dilemmas are so pervasive in everyday life that one can go so far as to claim that the most challenging task governments, organizations, and even partners in 14276 a relationship...
305. lappuse - Activities that mediate Knowledge from Source to User and are based on General Systems, Cybernetics, Automation and Technology for Human Work Environments in Timely and current Praxis.

Bibliogrāfiskā informācija