輔仁法學, 4. sējums私立輔仁大學法律學系曁研究所, 1985 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 28.
286. lappuse
... case M'Williams v . Sir William Arrol & Co. and Lithgows , Ltd. " " but because the contrary principle in M'Williams ' case has been followed in the English House of Lords case Wigley v . British Vinegars Ltd.72 Viscount Kilmuir in that ...
... case M'Williams v . Sir William Arrol & Co. and Lithgows , Ltd. " " but because the contrary principle in M'Williams ' case has been followed in the English House of Lords case Wigley v . British Vinegars Ltd.72 Viscount Kilmuir in that ...
288. lappuse
... case was that the plaintiff was working at the circular saw , that the fourth finger of her right hand was cut off ... case ... " In the whole judgment his Lordship said nothing about the onus of proof on the part of the defendant . The ...
... case was that the plaintiff was working at the circular saw , that the fourth finger of her right hand was cut off ... case ... " In the whole judgment his Lordship said nothing about the onus of proof on the part of the defendant . The ...
289. lappuse
... case are : 191 ( i ) No safety precautions ( e . g . to guard a circular saw ) as required by the statutory duty in question were taken ; and ( ii ) The plaintiff's injury was the very kind ( e . g . being cut by an unguarded circular ...
... case are : 191 ( i ) No safety precautions ( e . g . to guard a circular saw ) as required by the statutory duty in question were taken ; and ( ii ) The plaintiff's injury was the very kind ( e . g . being cut by an unguarded circular ...