Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

207 U. S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court.

of Columbia. October 21, 1907. Docketed, and dismissed with costs on motion of Mr. H. Prescott Gatley for the defendant in error. No one opposing.

No. 1. AGUSTIN CASTELLO, APPELLANT, v. ERNEST RUFFER ET AL. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico. October 28, 1907. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the fifteenth rule, on motion of Mr. George H. Lamar in behalf of counsel for the appellees. Mr. James S. Harlan and Mr. John Maynard Harlan for appellant. Mr. N. B. K. Pettingill for appellees.

No. 100. ARIZONA EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT, V. PHOENIX AND EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. October 29, 1907. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona. Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. Eugene S. Ives and Mr. Maxwell Evarts for appellant. Mr. Robert Dunlap, Mr. T. J. Norton and Mr. E. W. Camp for appellee.

No. 296. EVALYN S. FRANCE, FORMERLY EVALYN S. TOME, Appellant, v. JOSEPH M. COLEMAN ET AL. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. October 29, 1907. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for appellant. Mr. George E. Hamilton, Mr. M. J. Colbert and Mr. John J. Hamilton for appellant. No appearance for appellees.

No. 93. GOVAN BEARD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. In error to the Supreme Court of the State

Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. 207 U.S.

of Arkansas. November 5, 1907. Case having abated by reason of the death of plaintiff in error, writ of error dismissed. Mr. Baldy Vinson for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

No. 146. HENRY T. ANDERSON, APPELLANT, v. ANDREW J. ZARING. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma. November 11, 1907. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for the appellant, and mandate granted. Mr. S. H. Harris for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

No. 58. MODESTO MUNITIZ AGUIRRE, APPELLANT, v. SoBRINOS DE EZQUIAGA. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico. November 12, 1907. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Charles Hartzell for appellant. Mr. James S. Harlan and Mr. John Maynard Harlan for appellec

No. 153. THE CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN STIBBS. In error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma. December 2, 1907. Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. M. A. Low for plaintiff in error. Mr. P. C. Simons for defendant in error.

No. 192. NICOLAS ARCEO, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE UNITED STATES. In error to the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands. December 2, 1907. Dismissed, pursuant to the texth rule. Mr. Nicolas Arceo pro se. The Attorney General and T Solicitor General for defendant in error.

207 U.S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court.

No. 534. EUGENIO BUITRAGO, APPELLANT, v. THE PEOPLE OF PORTO RICO. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico. December 16, 1907. Docketed and dismissed with costs on motion of Mr. Henry M. Hoyt for appellees. No one opposing.

No. 50. JOHN A. CURTIN, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. GERTRUDE F. TUCKER. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. December 16, 1907. Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. Lee M. Friedman and Mr. Robert K. Dickerman for appellant. Mr. W. Hall Harris and Mr. John H. Sherburne, Jr., for appellee.

No. 335. J. I. CASE THRESHING MACHINE COMPANY, PETITIONER, V. THE INDIANA MANUFACTURING COMPANY. On a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. December 16, 1907. Dismissed without costs to either party, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Melville Church in behalf, of counsel. Mr. R. S. Taylor, Mr. I. K. Boyesen and Mr. James H. Peirce for petitioner. Mr. W. H. H. Miller, Mr. Charles K. Offield, Mr. Charles C. Linthicum, Mr. Chester Bradford and Mr. Harold Taylor for respondent.

No. 86. JOHN SHALEEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. December 16, 1907. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. William S. Opdyke for plaintiff in error. Mr. William John Barr and Mr. John R. Jones for defendant in error.

Case Dismissed in Vacation.

CASE DISMISSED IN VACATION.

207 U. S.

No. 131. REVERE WATER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF WINTHROP. In error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts. September 21, 1907. Dismissed, pursuant to the twentyeighth rule. Mr. A. E. Pillsbury for plaintiff in error. Mr. Lauriston L. Scaife for defendants in error.

[blocks in formation]

ADMIRALTY, Harter Act (see Admiralty, 2): The Hamilton, 398.
ALIENS, Immigration Act of March 3, 1903, § 18 (see Aliens, 1): Taylor v.
United States, 120.

BANKRUPTCY, act of 1898 (see Bankruptcy): Ex parte First Nat. Bank of
Chicago, 61. Sec. 25b, pars. 1, 2 (see Bankruptcy, 3): Chapman v.
Bowen, 89.

CONSPIRACY, Rev. Stat. § 5440 (see Criminal Law, 2): Williamson v. United
States, 425.

CONTRACTS WITH UNITED STATES, Rev. Stat. § 3744 (see Contracts, 4):
United States v. Andrews, 229.

COPYRIGHT, Rev. Stat. § 4962 (see Copyright, 3): American Tobacco Cɔ. v.
Werckmeister, 284. Rev. Stat. § 4965, as amended by the act of March 2,
1895 (see Copyright, 6): Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Co., 375.
CRIMINAL APPEALS, act of March 2, 1907 (see Constitutional Law, 12):
Taylor v. United States, 120.

EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT of June 11, 1906 (see Constitutional Law, 4):
Employers' Liability Cases, 463.

INDIANS, act of May 1, 1888 (see Indians, 2): Winters v. United States, 564.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE, act of February 4, 1887, § 22 (see Railroads, 1):
Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville R. R., 205.

JUDICIARY, Rev. Stat. § 709 (see Jurisdiction, A 16, 17): Chambers v. Balto.
& Ohio R. R. Co., 142; Sullivan v. Texas, 416. Rev. Stat. § 724 (see
Jurisdiction, B 1): Webster Coal & Coke Co. v. Cassatt, 181.

MONTANA, act of February 22, 1889 (see Indians, 2): Winters v. United
States, 564.

PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, act of July 1, 1902, § 10 (see Appeal and Error, 4):

Paraiso v. United States, 368.

605

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »