...decision of Stanley v. Georgia, 394 US 557, a 1969 decision, in which the Court said, and I quote : If the First Amendment means anything, it means that...what books he may read or what films he may watch. Now, I think this raises for us the question of whether or not watching television programs or films...

...In the Stanley case, the court said in effect that obscenity in the home is a constitutional right. "If the first amendment means anything, it means that...what books he may read or what films he may watch," Justice Thurgood Marshall said. "Our whole constitutional heritage rebels at the thought of giving...

...decision of Stanley v. Georgia, 394 US 557, a 1969 decision, in which the Court said, and I quote : If the First Amendment means anything, it means that...what books he may read or what films he may watch. Now, I think this raises for us the question of whether or not watching television programs or films...

...cannot constitutionally be made a crime," said the court. "If the first amendment means anything, k means that a state has no business telling a man, sitting alone in Ms own house, what books -he may read or what films he may watch." Miller has cashed in on the court...

...his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch," Justice Thurgood Marshall said. "Our whole constitutional heritage rebels at the thought of giving government the l«>werto control men's minds." Te judicial trend began in 1933 when Federal Judge John Woolsey lifted...

...found in a home, the right to have it is protected by the US Constitution. Justice Marshall said that "if the First Amendment means anything, it means that...what books he may read or what films he may watch." He considered that the entire heritage of Constitutional rights "rebels at the thought of giving government...

...other statutes regulating obscenity, we do not think they reach into the privacy of one's own home. If the First Amendment means anything it means that...what books he may read or what films he may watch." At page 551, Justice Marshall states: "Roth and the cases following that decision are not impaired...

...interfere. The constitutional basis for this approach was stated by Justice Marshall Stanley v. Georgia: "If the First Amendment means anything, it means that...man, sitting alone in his own house what books he ma read or what films he may watch. Our whole constitutional heritage rebels at the thought of giving...

...distribution. The Constitutional basis for this view was stated by Mr. Justice Marshall in Stanley v. Georgia: "If the First Amendment means anything, it means that...has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. Our whole constitutional heritage rebels...

...to make it impossible for nn unwilling individual to avoid exposure to it." (3S6 US at p. 769). "It the First Amendment means anything, it means that...has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. Our whole constitutional heritage rebels...