Slēptie lauki
Grāmatas Grāmatas
" The first and most important assignment of error is that the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury as contrary to the law and the evidence. "
The Southeastern Reporter - 241. lappuse
1899
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Reports of Cases at Law and in Chancery Argued and Determined in ..., 11. sējums

Illinois. Supreme Court - 1850 - 744 lapas
...appellee. Opinion by Mr. Justice TRUJIBULL : The only question in this case is, whether the Circuit Court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury as contrary to evidence. The action is trespass for shooting a horse, and presents questions peculiarly proper for...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Reports of Cases at Law and in Chancery Argued and Determined in ..., 3. sējums

Illinois. Supreme Court - 1841 - 704 lapas
...jury had misbehaved in dispersing; but the Court overruled the motion and the defendants excepted. The Court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury. The parties in the suit agreed that the jury should seal up their verdict and hand it to the...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Determined in the Supreme ..., 14. sējums

Iowa. Supreme Court - 1864 - 670 lapas
...rendered in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals. The only assignment of error, is that the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury, and grant to the plaintiff a new trial. Under this assignment it is claimed : 1st. That the verdict...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Mississippi State Cases: Being Criminal Cases Decided in the High ..., 2. sējums

1872 - 954 lapas
...the instruction was correct, and should have been given. The third and last error assigned is that the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury and grant a new trial It is very evident that the jury found their verdict upon a mistaken view...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Reports of Cases in Law and Equity, Determined in the Supreme ..., 33. sējums

Iowa. Supreme Court - 1873 - 662 lapas
...defendant ? In our opinion this question must be answered in the negative ; and as a consequence that the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury as being contrary to the evidence in the case. It may well be conceded, as the court below substantially...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Reports of Cases in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, 66. sējums

Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1875 - 1070 lapas
...second bill of exceptions was to the decision of the court overruling the motion of the prisoner to set aside the verdict of the jury as contrary to the law and evidence, and grant him a new trial. To the judgment pronounced against the prisoner as aforesaid,...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

The American Law Times Reports, 2. sējums

1875 - 788 lapas
...second bill of exceptions was to the decision of the court overruling the motion of the prisoner to set aside the verdict of the jury as contrary to the law and evidence, and grant him a new trial. To the judgment pronounced against the prisoner as aforesaid,...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of ..., 12. sējums

West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1878 - 976 lapas
...found by the jury to be true, the law of estoppel certainly bound the plaintiffs in this action. 5. The court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury. There is nothing in the record showing any boundary or description of the land in controversy,...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Reports of the Decisions of the Appellate Courts of the State of ..., 3. sējums

Illinois. Appellate Court, James Bolesworth Bradwell - 1879 - 714 lapas
...the verdict should have been for plaintiff for the contract price or the value of the property, and the court erred in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury and to grant a new trial. Judgment of the Circuit Court reversed and cause remanded. Reversed...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of ..., 18. sējums

West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals, Edgar P. Rucker - 1882 - 886 lapas
...which expressed truly the views and the motives of both the defendants. The court clearly did not err in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury as contrary to the law and evidence. Did it err in refusing to set aside this verdict, because the damages assessed by the jury,...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu




  1. Mana bibliotēka
  2. Palīdzība
  3. Izvērstā grāmatu meklēšana
  4. Lejupielādējiet ePub
  5. Lejupielādēt PDF