VOLUME 2. 34097 REPORTS AND DECISIONS OF THE 4.2. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION OF THE UNITED STATES. April 5th, 1888 to March 25th, 1889. REPORTED BY THE COMMISSION. NEW YORK: L. K. STROUSE & CO., LAW PUBLISHERS. 1889. Entered according to Act of Congress in the year 1889, by LK. STROUSE & CO, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington. TABLE OF CASES. PAGE. Brady, John W. S., et al, v. Pennsylvania Railroad 131 Burlington & Missouri River Railroad Company, in Nebraska, et al, Lincoln Board of Trade v. Business Men's Association of the State of Minnesota v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company Business Men's Association of the State of Minnesota v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company 301 147 73 Central Railroad of New Jersey, et al, New Jersey Fruit Chamber of Commerce of the City of Milwaukee v. 52 142 553 594 73 604 540 T. M. C., et al. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company, William Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, 231 25 PAGE. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, Business Men's Association of the State of Minnesota e. 52 Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, et al., New Orleans Cotton Exchange r. 375 Delaware State Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry e. New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad Company, et al. 309 Detroit Board of Trade et al. v. Grand Trunk Railway of Canada et al. 315 Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad Company et al., Chamber of Commerce of the City of Milwaukee г. 553 Grand Trunk Railway of Canada et al., Detroit Board of Trade et al., r. 315 Griffee, C. H. r. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad 301 Howell, Nathaniel W., et al., e. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company, et al, 272 Hailbart, Frank L., 2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company 122 Hurlburt, Frank L., v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company 130 Imperial Coal Company & Andrews, Hitchcock & Co. r. 618 554 In the Matter of Joint Water and Rail Lines 615 649 Report of the 398 Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Company v. Louisville & 162 Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company, 122 PAGE. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company, 90 Lincoln Board of Trade v. Burlington & Missouri 147 Company 155 Lippman, L. & Co v. Illinois Central Railroad Company 584 Logan, T. M. C., et al., v. Chicago & Northwestern Rail way Company 604 Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company Kentucky and Indiana Bridge Company v.. Martin, Euclid, et al. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Martin, John H., et al. v. Southern Pacific Company et al. Missouri Pacific Railway Company, Lincoln Board of Trade, v. Myers, Milton L., Survivor, etc., v. Pennsylvania Company, et al. New Jersey Fruit Exchange v. Central Railroad of New New Orleans Cotton Exchange v. Cincinnati, New Or- 162 25 1 594 155 573 142 375 338 New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company et al., Howell, Nathaniel W. et al v. 272 New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad Company et al., Delaware State Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry, v. 309 Nicolai, John Henry, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company et al. 131 Northern Pacific Railroad Company, James F. Slater, v. 359 513 Pennsylvania Company et al., Milton L. Myers, Sur |