HEIR. See Indians, 2-3.
HOMEWORK. See Labor, 6.
HUSBAND AND WIFE. See Taxation, I, 8–9.
IMMUNITY. See Admiralty, 1-3.
IMPORTS. See Constitutional Law, I, 3; Customs Duties; Philip-
pine Islands; Taxation, II.
IMPOUNDED FUNDS. See Public Utilities, 10.
INCOME TAX. See Taxation, I, 1–6.
INCOMPETENTS. See Indians, 3.
1. Treaties. Shoshones. Treaty of July 30, 1863 with North-
western Bands of Shoshones was not recognition or acknowledg-
ment by United States of Indian title to lands; claim to compen-
sation not within special jurisdictional Act as one "arising under
or growing out of" treaty. Shoshone Indians v. U. S., 335.
2. Restricted Lands. Mortgage given by Osage heir prior to
state court decree of heirship, invalid. Drummond v. U. S., 316.
3. Id. When lands inherited from incompetent Osage allottee
deemed "turned over." Id.
4. Id. Suit by United States to enforce restrictions not barred
by prior judgment in proceedings in which Secretary of Interior
had authorized employment and approved fees of counsel for
Indian. Id.
INDIAN TITLE. See Indians, 1.
INFRINGEMENT. See Equity; Patents for Inventions, 9.
INHERITANCE. See Indians, 2-3.
INJUNCTION. See Antitrust Acts, 4; Jurisdiction, II, 1; Pro-
cedure, 6.
Scope of Jurisdiction. Successors and assigns. Regal Knitwear
Co. v. Labor Board, 9.
INJURIES. See Criminal Law, 2.
IN REM PROCEEDINGS. See Admiralty, 1, 3.
INSANITY. See Indians, 3.
INSURANCE. See Constitutional Law, I, 1-2; II, 2; IV, (A), 1.
Reserves. State regulation; validity of Wisconsin statute.
State Farm Ins. Co. v. Duel, 154.
When Recoverable. Interest on minimum wages and liquidated
damages not recoverable in judgment under § 16 (b) of Fair Labor
Standards Act. Brooklyn Bank v. O'Neil, 697; Fitzgerald Con-
struction Co. v. Pedersen, 720.
Immunity. Merchant vessel owned but not possessed by foreign
government not immune from suit. Mexico v. Hoffman, 30.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE. See Antitrust Acts, 1-3; Jurisdic-
tion, II, 1; Labor, 3; Public Utilities, 2.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT.
Review of Commission. Reversal by District Court of order in
respect of provision therein to which suitor had acquiesced was
improper. U. S. v. Hancock Truck Lines, 774.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. See Interstate Com-
merce Act.
INTOXICATING LIQUORS. See Antitrust Acts, 1.
Twenty-First Amendment. Effect of. U. S. v. Frankfort Dis-
tilleries, 293.
INVENTION. See Patents for Inventions.
JUDGMENTS. See Indians, 4; Interest; Jurisdiction, I, 2; II,
4-13; Procedure, 4.
Res Judicata. See Young v. Higbee Co., 204.
JURISDICTION. See Bankruptcy, 1-3; Indians, 1; Procedure;
Public Utilities, 1, 9-10.
I. In General, p. 902.
II. Jurisdiction of this Court, p. 902.
III. Jurisdiction of Circuit Courts of Appeals, p. 903.
References to particular subjects under title Jurisdiction:
Administrative Decisions, I, 8-13; All-Writs Act, II, 3; Appeal,
I, 1; II, 7; III, 1; Certificate of Probable Cause, III, 1; Certiorari,
II, 3; Concurrent Findings, I, 6-7; Condemnation Proceedings,
I, 2; Continuance, I, 4; II, 12; Evidence, I, 9; Fair Labor Standards.
Act, II, 11; Federal Question, I, 4-5; II, 9-13; Finality of Judg-
ments, I, 2; II, 8; Habeas Corpus, I, 3; Injunction, II, 1; Inter-
state Commerce Commission, I, 13; Natural Gas Act, III, 2-4;
Original Jurisdiction, II, 1-2; Patents, I, 7; Scope of Review,
II, 4-6, 9; III, 2-3; Secretary of Treasury, I, 8; States, II, 1–2;
Tax Court, I, 10-12; Venue, III, 2.
1. Appeal. Timeliness. U. S. v. Hancock Truck Lines -
2. Finality of Judgments. Orders in condemnation proceedings
as not appealable "final decisions" under Jud. Code § 125. Cas
v. U. S., 229.
3. Habeas Corpus Proceedings. Scope of federal court review
of state court adjudication. House . Mayo, 42; Rice v. Olson THE
4. Federal Question. Continuance to enable petitioners to
ascertain whether state court decided federal question. Herb V
Pitcairn, 117.
5. Id. Whether at death of taxpayer dividend had "scerced"
under § 42 of 1938 Revenue Act was federal question. Estate of
Putnam v. Commissioner, 393.
6. Concurrent Findings. Decisions of two courts below that
vessel was not in possession or service of Mexican government,
supported by evidence. Mexico v. Hoffman, 30.
7. Conflict Between Circuits. Factual issue of validity of patent
determined by this Court independently. Dow Co. v. Halliburton
Co., 320.
8. Administrative Action. Action of Secretary of Treasury
under § 522 (c) of Tariff Act of 1930 as subject to judicial review.
Barr v. U. S., 83.
9. Id. Reviewing court may determine whether there is evi-
dence legally sufficient for administrative action, but may not
weigh it. Webre Steib Co. v. Commissioner, 164.
10. Review of Tax Court. Conclusiveness of Tax Court de-
cision. Choate v. Commissioner, 1; Commissioner v. Wemyss,
303; Commissioner v. Court Holding Co., 331.
11. Id. Decision of Tax Court that transfer lacked "consider-
ation in money or money's worth," under § 503 of 1932 Act, bind-
ing on review. Commissioner v. Wemyss, 303.
12. Id. Conclusion of Tax Court as supported by record. Com-
missioner v. Smith, 695.
13. Review of Interstate Commerce Commission. Reversal of
order in respect of provision therein to which suitor had acquiesced
was improper. U.S. v. Hancock Truck Lines, 774.
II. Jurisdiction of this Court.
1. Original Jurisdiction. Leave granted Georgia to file com-
plaint seeking injunctive relief against conspiracy of railroads to
fix freight rates which discriminate against State. Georgia v.
Pennsylvania R. Co., 439.
2. Id. Jurisdiction of suit in which State is party. Id.
Cause as one reviewable not
under § 240 (a) but under § 262 of Judicial Code. House v.
Mayo, 42.
4. Id. Scope of review under § 262 of Judicial Code. Id.
5. Review of Federal Courts. Conflict between Circuits as to
validity of patent; factual issue of validity determined here inde-
pendently. Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Co., 320.
6. Id. Power of this Court to modify decree of District Court
in antitrust case. Hartford-Empire Co. v. U. S., 570.
7. Review of State Courts. Requisites of appeal under Judicial
Code § 237 (a) and certiorari under § 237 (c). Charleston Loan
Assn. v. Alderson, 182.
8. Id. Finality of judgment. Market Street R. Co. v. Railroad
Comm'n, 548.
9. Id. Scope of review where federal right or immunity in-
volved. Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 652.
Existence of federal question. Rice v. Olson, 786.
11. Id. Question of right to interest on sums recoverable under
§ 16 (b) of Fair Labor Standards Act was federal question. Brook-
lyn Bank v. O'Neil, 697.
12. Id. Continuances granted to enable petitioners to ascertain
from state court whether it decided federal question. Herb v.
Pitcairn, 117.
13. Id. Judgment of state court as based on adequate non-fed-
eral ground. White v. Ragen, 760; Copperweld Co. v. Industrial
Commission, 780.
III. Jurisdiction of Circuit Courts of Appeals.
1. Appeals. Certificate of Probable Cause. Failure of C. C. A.
to consider propriety and to issue certificate was error. House v.
Mayo, 42.
2. Natural Gas Act. Objection in proceeding under § 19 (b)
that natural gas company is not located and does not have prin-
cipal place of business in circuit in which the proceeding was
brought goes to venue, not jurisdiction, and is too late when raised
for first time after judgment. Panhandle Co. v. Power Comm'n,
635.
3. Id. Scope of review of order of Commission. Id.
4. Id. Distribution of Impounded Funds. C. C. A. was without
jurisdiction to adjudicate rights of consumers in funds impounded
on review of rate order or to order payment to municipal officers.
Central States Co. v. Muscatine, 138.
KIDNAPPING. See Criminal Law, 2.
1. Fair Labor Standards Act. Coverage Exempruns
rowly construed. Phillips Co. v. Wang, 40
2. Id. Warehouse and central cre empires o masz
retail chain store system not exempt engines i tui en
lishment." Id.
3. Id. Applicable to employees engaged in repaintg sbomments
and substructures of bridges on Eine of intestat mad Fa
gerald Co. v. Pedersen, 720.
4. Fair Labor Standards Act. Remedies Ware of nes to
minimum wages and liquidated damages. Brooklyn Bois v
O'Neil, 697.
5. Id. Interest on minimum wages and gidated damagES DOC
includible in judgment under § 16 (b). Brooklyn Bonis v. ONL
697; Fitzgerald Co. v. Pedersen, 720.
6. Fair Labor Standards Act. Enforcement. Autbonty of
Administrator, as means of effectuating minimum wage order for
embroideries industry, to prohibit homework. Gemsco v. Waling.
244.
7. National Labor Relations Act. Unfair labor practices: DO-
solicitation and no-distribution rules; discharge for wearing "shop
steward" buttons. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Labor Board, 793.
8. Id. Orders of Board. Enforcement. Provision of cease and
desist order for enforcement against employer's "successors and
assigns"; validity and application. Regal Knitwear Co. v. Labor
Board, 9.
LANDOWNERS. See Contracts, 1; Eminent Domain; Indians.
LANDS. See Contracts, 1; Eminent Domain; Indians, 1—4.
LEASE. See Taxation, I, 6.
LEGITIMATE COST. See Public Utilities, 5.
LIBEL. See Admiralty, 1, 3.
LIMITATIONS. See Bankruptcy, 2.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. See Labor, 4-5.
LIQUIDATING DIVIDEND. See Taxation, I, 5.
LOCAL DISTRIBUTION. See Public Utilities, 1–2.
MANN ACT. See Criminal Law, 1.
MARRIAGE. See Taxation, I, 8-9.
|