DECISIONS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS IN PATENT AND TRADE-MARK AND COMPILED FROM VOLS. 402-413, INCLUSIVE, OF THE OFFICIAL 402721 COMMISSIONER OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE FOR THE YEAR 1931 HON. THOMAS E. ROBERTSON FIRST ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HON. WM. A. KINNAN ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HON. M. J. MOORE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HON. FRED M. HOPKINS FROM MAY 18, 1930 CASES REPORTED [Decisions of the Board of Appeals are indicated by the letter ("); of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia by the letter (4); of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals by a star (*); of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals by the letter ("); and of the Supreme Court of the United States by the letter (').] 73 711 727, 732 427 399 299 563 *American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. John Braadland, Ltd.. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Company__. *American Patents Development Corporation and Dry Ice Corporation of America. Carbice Corporation of America, v__ *Anhaltzer. In re *Arch Preserver Shoe Patents, Trustees for v. James McCreery & Company. c Armbruster. In re-. *Armstrong Cork & Insulation Co. v. Banner Rock Products Co. * Bonide Chemical Company, Inc. In re.. *Banner Rock Products Co. Armstrong Cork & Insulation Co. v.. *Bear Glacé Fruit Company. California Canneries Company v *Beers. In re-. *Bellis. In re-- *Bender. McFarland v.. *Benner. In re *Benner and Werking. In re- Bennett v. Fitzgerald.... *Bertram. In re... *Blair and Perrault. Sundback v- *Blunt v. Grace__. *Both. In re-. *Bourjois, Inc. 563 22 49 69 212 176 206 448 601 259 111 199 106 (International Perfume Co. Inc., Substituted) v. Cheat ham Chemical Co-_-_ 240 *Braadland, Ltd., John. American Fruit Growers, Ltd. v. *Braren v. Horner___ Brogdex Company. American Fruit Growees, Inc. v___. *Bromley-Shepard Co., Inc. Model Brassiere Co., Inc. v.. *Bronson. In re--- 711 502 444 *Bronston Bros. and Co., Inc. The Celotex Company v *Bull Medicine Company, W. H. Spicer v.. California Canneries Company v. Bear Glacé Fruit Company. * California Canneries Company v. Lush'us Products Company. Campbell. In re.. 22 625 561 Page * Celanese Corporation of America v. Vanity Fair Silk Mills. *Carbice Corporation of America v. American Patents Development Cor poration and Dry Ice Corporation of America___ * Carlson. In re-. * Celotex Company, The v. Bronston Bros. and Co., Inc. 727, 732 59, 519 217, 303 643 * Celotex Company v. Chicago Panelstone Company_. *Celotex Company, The v. Millington-- 651 640 In re-. b Chamberlain. Ex parte-- * Cheatham Chemical Co. Bourjois, Inc. (International Perfume Co,. Inc., Substituted v. * Chicago Panelstone Company. The Celotex Company v Clarke and Malm. Ex parte.. Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. Wright___. * Coca Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles. In re. * Coffee v. Creveling-. *Cogswell. *Cole and Cochran. In re-. *Collins. In re-. * Combine Hosiery Corporation. House of Tre-Jur, Inc. v---. Concrete Mixing and Conveying Company v. R. C. Storrie & Company 10 240 651 6 186 597 646 369 131 247 635 698 Concrete Mixing and Conveying Company No. 3. Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corporation and Fleck v--- 698 Cooper. Robertson v. 692 * Crete Mills and Security Mills and Feed Company, The. Pratt Food Company v Curtiss Candy Company, The. George H. Ruth Candy Company, Inc. v. 637 D c Dann. In re * Decker & Cohn, Inc., v. Liebovitz & Sons, Inc_ *De Forest v. Owens--. * De Forest v. Vogt, Massole, and Engl__ *Deibel v. Heise and Schumacher.. "De Forest Radio Company v. General Electric Company. *De Lany. In re. d Deshell Laboratories, Inc. v. E. R. Squibbs & Sons et al. and Thomas E. Robertson, Commissioner of Patents___. 306, 581 109 589 648 734 156 183 13 77 14 5 493 431 388 88 681 671, 684 * Egler. In re.. 575 * Eicher. Larson and Campbell v 631 * Einstein. In re- 165 *Ellis and Holden. In re 330 Ensten and Lion Knitting Mills Company v. Simon, Ascher & Co., Inc.*Escholz. In re-. 705 272 * Establissements Rene Beziers, Societe Anonyme v. Reid, Murdoch & Co_ * Evans, Jones v- * Farrand. In re-. * Fashion Park, Incorporated v. The Fair__. * Federal Mill & Elevator Co., Inc., v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Company. * Fessenden v. Wilson and Schafer_ Page 660 620 543 419 594, 649 294, 338 545, 552 448 257, 289 177 484 General Electric Company. De Forest Radio Company v. * General Petroleum Corporation of California. In re.. Gilbert Chocolate Co., John O. The Gilbert Company v * Hammermill Paper Co. J. P. Heilbronn Paper Co. v. * Handschiegl. Williams v. *Hartog v. Long--. Hartog v. Long and Gulick__. * Hayman. Miller v-- *Headley & Thompson v. Bridges_ * Hedenskoog v. Backus_ * Heger Products Co. v. Polk Miller Products Corp.... * Heidbrink v. McKesson__. * Heilbronn Paper Co., J. P. v. Hammermill Paper Co... * Heise and Schumacher. Deibel v_ * Hermans. In re-- Holmes. Ex parte.. * Holst. In re_ * Hood Rubber Company. Weyenberg Shoe Manufacturing Company v 734 609 479 479 111 745 9 525 487 531 475 221 521 423 262 267, 270 137 405 316 345 696 521 156 454 3 55, 58 613 278 441 635 500 * House of Tre-Jur, Inc., v. Combine Hosiery Corporation_ 456 * Jantzen Knitting Mills v. West Coast Knitting Mills. 159 * Kotex Company v. Clarence M. McArthur_. *Kotex Company. Rotex Surgical Appliance Company r 35 2 296 25 536 42 95 50 |