Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

DECISIONS

OF THE

COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

AND OF THE

UNITED STATES COURTS

IN

PATENT AND TRADE-MARK AND
COPYRIGHT CASES

COMPILED FROM VOLS. 402-413, INCLUSIVE, OF THE OFFICIAL
GAZETTE OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][subsumed][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

402721

COMMISSIONER OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE FOR THE YEAR 1931

HON. THOMAS E. ROBERTSON

FIRST ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

HON. WM. A. KINNAN

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

HON. M. J. MOORE

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

HON. FRED M. HOPKINS

FROM MAY 18, 1930

CASES REPORTED

[Decisions of the Board of Appeals are indicated by the letter ("); of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia by the letter (4); of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals by a star (*); of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals by the letter ("); and of the Supreme Court of the United States by the letter (').]

[blocks in formation]

73

711

727, 732

427

399

299

563

*American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. John Braadland, Ltd.. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Company__.

*American Patents Development Corporation and Dry Ice Corporation of America. Carbice Corporation of America, v__

*Anhaltzer. In re

*Arch Preserver Shoe Patents, Trustees for v. James McCreery & Company.

c Armbruster. In re-.

*Armstrong Cork & Insulation Co. v. Banner Rock Products Co.

[blocks in formation]

* Bonide Chemical Company, Inc. In re..

*Banner Rock Products Co. Armstrong Cork & Insulation Co. v.. *Bear Glacé Fruit Company. California Canneries Company v

*Beers. In re-.

*Bellis. In re--

*Bender. McFarland v..

*Benner. In re

*Benner and Werking. In re-

Bennett v. Fitzgerald....

*Bertram. In re...

*Blair and Perrault. Sundback v-

*Blunt v. Grace__.

*Both. In re-.

*Bourjois, Inc.

563

22

49

69

212

176

206

448

601

259

111

199

106

(International Perfume Co. Inc., Substituted) v. Cheat

ham Chemical Co-_-_

240

*Braadland, Ltd., John. American Fruit Growers, Ltd. v. *Braren v. Horner___

[blocks in formation]

Brogdex Company. American Fruit Growees, Inc. v___. *Bromley-Shepard Co., Inc. Model Brassiere Co., Inc. v.. *Bronson. In re---

711

502

444

*Bronston Bros. and Co., Inc. The Celotex Company v *Bull Medicine Company, W. H. Spicer v..

[blocks in formation]

California Canneries Company v. Bear Glacé Fruit Company. * California Canneries Company v. Lush'us Products Company. Campbell. In re..

22

625

561

Page

* Celanese Corporation of America v. Vanity Fair Silk Mills.

*Carbice Corporation of America v. American Patents Development Cor

poration and Dry Ice Corporation of America___

* Carlson. In re-.

* Celotex Company, The v. Bronston Bros. and Co., Inc.

727, 732

59, 519

217, 303

643

* Celotex Company v. Chicago Panelstone Company_. *Celotex Company, The v. Millington--

651

640

In re-.

b Chamberlain. Ex parte--

* Cheatham Chemical Co. Bourjois, Inc. (International Perfume Co,. Inc., Substituted v.

* Chicago Panelstone Company. The Celotex Company v

Clarke and Malm. Ex parte..

Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. Wright___.

* Coca Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles. In re.

* Coffee v. Creveling-.

*Cogswell.

*Cole and Cochran. In re-.

*Collins. In re-.

* Combine Hosiery Corporation. House of Tre-Jur, Inc. v---.

Concrete Mixing and Conveying Company v. R. C. Storrie & Company
No. 4------

10

240

651

6

186

597

646

369

131

247

635

698

Concrete Mixing and Conveying Company No. 3. Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corporation and Fleck v---

698

Cooper. Robertson v.

692

* Crete Mills and Security Mills and Feed Company, The. Pratt Food Company v

[blocks in formation]

Curtiss Candy Company, The. George H. Ruth Candy Company, Inc. v.

637

D

c Dann. In re

* Decker & Cohn, Inc., v. Liebovitz & Sons, Inc_

*De Forest v. Owens--.

* De Forest v. Vogt, Massole, and Engl__

*Deibel v. Heise and Schumacher..

"De Forest Radio Company v. General Electric Company.

*De Lany. In re.

d Deshell Laboratories, Inc. v. E. R. Squibbs & Sons et al. and Thomas E. Robertson, Commissioner of Patents___.

[blocks in formation]

306, 581

109

589

648

734

156

183

13

77

14

5

493

431

388

88

681

671, 684

* Egler. In re..

575

* Eicher.

Larson and Campbell v

631

* Einstein. In re-

165

*Ellis and Holden.

In re

330

Ensten and Lion Knitting Mills Company v. Simon, Ascher & Co., Inc.*Escholz. In re-.

705

272

* Establissements Rene Beziers, Societe Anonyme v. Reid, Murdoch & Co_ * Evans, Jones v-

[blocks in formation]

* Farrand. In re-.

* Fashion Park, Incorporated v. The Fair__.

* Federal Mill & Elevator Co., Inc., v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Company. * Fessenden v. Wilson and Schafer_

[blocks in formation]

Page

660

620

543

419

594, 649

294, 338

545, 552

448

257, 289

177

484

General Electric Company. De Forest Radio Company v. * General Petroleum Corporation of California.

In re..

Gilbert Chocolate Co., John O. The Gilbert Company v
Gilbert Company, The, v. John O. Gilbert Chocolate Co

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

* Hammermill Paper Co. J. P. Heilbronn Paper Co. v.

* Handschiegl. Williams v.

*Hartog v. Long--.

Hartog v. Long and Gulick__.

* Hayman. Miller v--

*Headley & Thompson v. Bridges_

* Hedenskoog v. Backus_

* Heger Products Co. v. Polk Miller Products Corp....

* Heidbrink v. McKesson__.

* Heilbronn Paper Co., J. P. v. Hammermill Paper Co...

* Heise and Schumacher. Deibel v_

* Hermans. In re--

Holmes. Ex parte..

* Holst. In re_

* Hood Rubber Company. Weyenberg Shoe Manufacturing Company v

734

609

479

479

111

745

9

525

487

531

475

221

521

423

262

267, 270

137

405

316

345

696

521

156

454

3

55, 58

613

278

441

635

500

[blocks in formation]

* House of Tre-Jur, Inc., v. Combine Hosiery Corporation_

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

456

* Jantzen Knitting Mills v. West Coast Knitting Mills.

159

[blocks in formation]

* Kotex Company v. Clarence M. McArthur_.

*Kotex Company. Rotex Surgical Appliance Company r

35

2

296

25

536

42

95

50

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »