Major Administrative Process Problems: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, Eighty-sixth Congress, First Session, Panel Discussion by a Representative of Industry, of the Government, and of the Bar, June 15-19, 22-24, 26, 1959U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959 - 794 lappuses Examines exercise of adjudicatory and rulemaking authority by Federal independent regulatory commissions. Focuses on equitability of administrative procedures and the role of communication between regulatory agencies and regulated industries. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
1. lappuse
... important a problem as the Congress can deal with , particularly since it affects all the major regulatory agencies of our Government , in trying to arrive at the most appropriate procedure with reference to administrative actions of ...
... important a problem as the Congress can deal with , particularly since it affects all the major regulatory agencies of our Government , in trying to arrive at the most appropriate procedure with reference to administrative actions of ...
9. lappuse
... importance of it , feel that that was a most important decision . The Department of Justice in its brief before the court of appeals on remand urged that the case be returned to the Commission on the grounds that the ex parte approaches ...
... importance of it , feel that that was a most important decision . The Department of Justice in its brief before the court of appeals on remand urged that the case be returned to the Commission on the grounds that the ex parte approaches ...
23. lappuse
... important to my client but not important in the overall run of the Commission's work or the Board's work . I intend to present some remarks which I hope will have a bearing on that at a later stage . But , as far as the hearing process ...
... important to my client but not important in the overall run of the Commission's work or the Board's work . I intend to present some remarks which I hope will have a bearing on that at a later stage . But , as far as the hearing process ...
30. lappuse
... important point , and that is the fact that Congressmen at oral argument almost always appear without any notice at all to the opposition , so that , for example , if you go down before oral argument you do not know who your opponent is ...
... important point , and that is the fact that Congressmen at oral argument almost always appear without any notice at all to the opposition , so that , for example , if you go down before oral argument you do not know who your opponent is ...
38. lappuse
... important problem . Mr. DURFEE . Mr. Chairman , may I say in the specific area with which we are dealing , that is the area of the right of Members of Congress to participate in oral arguments as recognized by the Board today under its ...
... important problem . Mr. DURFEE . Mr. Chairman , may I say in the specific area with which we are dealing , that is the area of the right of Members of Congress to participate in oral arguments as recognized by the Board today under its ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action adjudication adjudicatory administrative agencies Administrative Procedure Act administrative process adversary American Bar Association appear application Arpaia attorney Bar Association BEELAR believe bill Bureau carriers Chairman Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Commis Commissioners committee conference Congressman contested counsel court division DURFEE employees ex parte communications examiner's fact Federal Communications Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission feel filed FLYNT functions GADSBY GATCHELL hearing examiner important industry initial decision Interstate Commerce Commission investigation involved issues judicial KINTNER KUYKENDALL LISHMAN matter Member of Congress mission natural gas opinion oral argument panel discussion parties pending person position practice present President problem proceedings proposed public interest question recommendations record regulation representatives respect responsibility ROGERS of Texas role rulemaking rules sion SPRINGER staff statement statute subcommittee suggest talk thing tion topic trial examiner views WESTWOOD