United States Supreme Court Reports, 55. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1979 First series, books 1-43, includes "Notes on U.S. reports" by Walter Malins Rose. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 86.
319. lappuse
... defendant's decision not to testify . The Court of Appeals of Oregon later reversed the defendant's conviction , and ordered a new trial , holding that the better rule was to not give instructions ostensibly designed for the benefit of ...
... defendant's decision not to testify . The Court of Appeals of Oregon later reversed the defendant's conviction , and ordered a new trial , holding that the better rule was to not give instructions ostensibly designed for the benefit of ...
328. lappuse
... defendant and his lawyer the abso- lute right to decide that the accused shall not become a witness against himself . Even if the judge is con- vinced that the defendant's testi- mony would exonerate him , and even if he is motivated ...
... defendant and his lawyer the abso- lute right to decide that the accused shall not become a witness against himself . Even if the judge is con- vinced that the defendant's testi- mony would exonerate him , and even if he is motivated ...
330. lappuse
... defendant's request that the instruction not be given . Remarka- bly , the Court fails to identify any reason for overriding the defendant's choice . Eliminating the instruction on request costs the State nothing , other than the ...
... defendant's request that the instruction not be given . Remarka- bly , the Court fails to identify any reason for overriding the defendant's choice . Eliminating the instruction on request costs the State nothing , other than the ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
18 USCS 29 USCS 42 USCS 55 L Ed 98 S Ct action agreement aliens amicus curiae antitrust laws apply Attorney Blackmun Brennan certiorari Circuit denied Clause commerce Commerce Clause Commission concurring Cong Congress constitutional corporate Court of Appeals criminal decision defendant dissenting District Court due process employees F Supp February 21 federal Fifth Amendment filed Fourteenth Amendment granted holding immunity imposed income infra interest issue judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice L Ed 2d labor legislative liability March 20 Maryland ment non-Indians opinion pension persons Petition for writ petitioner political Powell procedural prohibition protection purpose question rari regulations Rehnquist remanded respondent rule Sherman Act sion Stat statute stevedoring supra Supremacy Clause Supreme Court tankers tapes tion tional tiorari titioner trial United States 435 United States Court violation voting Worthen writ of cer writ of certio