United States Supreme Court Reports, 55. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1979 First series, books 1-43, includes "Notes on U.S. reports" by Walter Malins Rose. |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 86.
128. lappuse
... concluded that , barring reports of radical improve- ment , respondent should not be allowed to re - enroll ; and when a report on an- other rotation turned out to be negative , the Council recommended that respon- dent be dropped ...
... concluded that , barring reports of radical improve- ment , respondent should not be allowed to re - enroll ; and when a report on an- other rotation turned out to be negative , the Council recommended that respon- dent be dropped ...
236. lappuse
... concluded that a jury of less than six would not satisfy the fair - cross - section requirement of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments . Mr. Justice Powell , with whom The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Rehnquist joined , concluded that ...
... concluded that a jury of less than six would not satisfy the fair - cross - section requirement of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments . Mr. Justice Powell , with whom The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Rehnquist joined , concluded that ...
245. lappuse
... concluded that the six - per- son jury did not fail to represent adequately a cross - section of the community , the opportunity for meaningful and appropriate repre- sentation does decrease with the size of the panels . Thus , if a ...
... concluded that the six - per- son jury did not fail to represent adequately a cross - section of the community , the opportunity for meaningful and appropriate repre- sentation does decrease with the size of the panels . Thus , if a ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
18 USCS 29 USCS 42 USCS 55 L Ed 98 S Ct action agreement aliens amicus curiae antitrust laws apply Attorney Blackmun Brennan certiorari Circuit denied Clause commerce Commerce Clause Commission concurring Cong Congress constitutional corporate Court of Appeals criminal decision defendant dissenting District Court due process employees F Supp February 21 federal Fifth Amendment filed Fourteenth Amendment granted holding immunity imposed income infra interest issue judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice L Ed 2d labor legislative liability March 20 Maryland ment non-Indians opinion pension persons Petition for writ petitioner political Powell procedural prohibition protection purpose question rari regulations Rehnquist remanded respondent rule Sherman Act sion Stat statute stevedoring supra Supremacy Clause Supreme Court tankers tapes tion tional tiorari titioner trial United States 435 United States Court violation voting Worthen writ of cer writ of certio