DIVERSITY JURISDICTION. See Jurisdiction, I, 4; IV, 2—4.
DIVORCE. See also Constitutional Law, VII, 1.

Custody of children-Modification of decree-Florida law.-Effect
of custody decree of Florida court; power of New York court to
modify. Halvey v. Halvey, 610.

DOCKETING. See Jurisdiction, II, 2.

DOUBLE JEOPARDY. See Constitutional Law, V.

DUE PROCESS. See Constitutional Law, VIII, 1–3.

EDUCATION. See Constitutional Law, IV; VIII, 1.

EMERGENCY PRICE CONTROL ACT. See Constitutional Law,
II, 2.

EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE. See Antitrust Acts, 1-2; Labor,
1-10.

ENEMY. See Treason.

ENGINEERS. See Labor, 6.

ENGLAND. See Transportation, 2.

EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS. See Constitutional Law, IX.
EVIDENCE. See Antitrust Acts, 2; Constitutional Law, I, 2;
Criminal Law, 2; Transportation, 3; Treason.

EXECUTIVE ORDERS. See Indians, 1.

EXECUTIVES. See Labor, 6.

EXEMPTION. See Labor, 5-7.

FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT.. See Injunction, 1-2; Labor,
5-8.

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION. See Priority.

FARM LABOR ACT. See Criminal Law, 1.

FEDERAL EMPLOYEES. See Constitutional Law, III, 1-2;
Government Employees, 1-3; Jurisdiction, I, 2–3.

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. See Jurisdiction, II,
2; Procedure, 2, 4–5.

FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. See Proce-
dure, 3.

FEED LOANS. See Priority.

FERTILIZER. See Transportation, 2.

FIFTH AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, VIII, 2-3.

FINDINGS. See Jurisdiction, III; Procedure, 8; Transportation, 3.
FINES. See Constitutional Law, V; Criminal Law, 5-6; Contempt,
1-2.

FIRST AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, III, 1, 2; IV.

FLORIDA. See Constitutional Law, VII, 1; Divorce.

FOREIGN COMMERCE. See Constitutional Law, VI, 2; Taxa-
tion, 2.

FOREMEN. See Constitutional Law, VI, 1; Labor, 1-2.

FORUM NON CONVENIENS. See Jurisdiction, IV, 3-4.

FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, IV;
VIII, 1; IX.

FRAUD. See Criminal Law, 2.

FULL FAITH AND CREDIT.

See Constitutional Law, VII, 1-3.

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. See also Constitutional Law, II,
3; Jurisdiction, I, 2–3.

1. Political activity-Prohibition-Hatch Act.-Validity and con-
struction of Hatch Act, providing for removal of federal employees
for political activity. United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 75.

2. Id.-Acting as ward leader of political party and as worker
at polls violated Hatch Act. Id.

3. Id. Hatch Act applicable to industrial as well as administrative
employees of executive branch of Government. Id.

GRANTS. See Indians, 1; Statutes, 6.

GREAT BRITAIN. See Transportation, 2.

GROSS RECEIPTS TAX. See Constitutional Law, VI, 2; Taxa-
tion, 2.

HATCH ACT. See also Constitutional Law, I, 1; II, 3; Jurisdiction,
I, 2-3, 7.

Validity and construction.-United Public Workers v. Mitchell,
75; Oklahoma v. Civil Service Comm'n, 127.

HOURS. See Labor, 5-8.

ILLICIT LIQUORS. See Criminal Law, 2.

ILLINOIS. See Constitutional Law, VII, 2.

IMMIGRATION. See Criminal Law, 1; Jurisdiction, II, 1.

INDEMNITY. See Admiralty, 1.

INDIANS.

1. Ute Indians-Compensation for lands-Right of recovery.-Ute
Indians without compensable interest in lands made available to
them by 1875 Executive Order which were outside of 1868 treaty
boundary; 1880 Act did not convey or ratify conveyance of such
lands. Ute Indians v. U. S., 169.

2. Indian treaties-Construction.-Construction of treaty with In-
dians as affected by their understanding. Id.

INDICTMENT. See also Jurisdiction, II, 1.

Sufficiency-Sufficiency of indictment charging conspiracy to vio-
late Sherman Act. Brotherhood of Carpenters v. U. S., 395.

INFORMATION. See Jurisdiction, II, 1.

INJUNCTION.

1. Propriety-Fair Labor Standards Act.-Denial to Wage-Hour
Administrator of injunction as to group of employees as to whom
the employer had been complying with Act, sustained. Walling v.
Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co., 158.

2. Injunction against strike-Statutory restrictions Suit by Gov-
ernment. Injunction against strike in government-operated coal
mines pending judicial interpretation of contract with labor union;
contempt of restraining order; propriety of procedure and penalty.
U. S. v. United Mine Workers, 258.

INSOLVENCY. See Priority.

INSTRUCTIONS TO JURY. See Trial, 3.

INTERNAL REVENUE. See Criminal Law, 2.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE. See Constitutional Law, VI, 1–2;
Taxation, 2; Transportation, 1-3.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. See Labor, 7; Trans-
portation, 3.

JEOPARDY. See Constitutional Law, V.

JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING VERDICT.

See Procedure, 4.

JUDGMENTS. See also Constitutional Law, V; VII, 1-3; Divorce;
Procedure, 4.

Res judicata-Effect of state court judgment in federal court-
Diversity jurisdiction.-State court judgment as adjudication on mer-
its barring relitigation in federal court. Angel v. Bullington, 183.

JURISDICTION. See also Admiralty, 1; Constitutional Law, II,
1-2; VII, 1-3; Contempt, 2; Procedure.

I. In General, p. 865.

II. Supreme Court, p. 866.

III. Circuit Courts of Appeals, p. 866.
IV. District Courts, p. 866.

References to particular subjects under title Jurisdiction.-Amount
in Controversy, IV, 2; Case or Controversy, I, 2-3; Certiorari, II,
3; Clayton Act, I, 1; Contempt, I, 5; Criminal Appeals Act, II, 1;
Derivative Suit, IV, 4; Direct Appeal, II, 1-2; Diversity Jurisdiction,
I, 4; IV, 2-4; Findings, III; Forum Non Conveniens, IV, 3-4;
Hatch Act, I, 2-3, 7; Immigration Act, II, 1; Injunction, I, 1-3;
Jurisdictional Amount, IV, 2; Labor Relations Act, I, 6; Mandate,
II, 4; Maritime Commission, IV, 1; Norris-LaGuardia Act, I, 1;
Remand, II, 4; Scope of Review, I, 5-7; State Courts, I, 4; II, 4;
States, I, 4, 7; Workmen's Compensation, IV, 2.

I. In General.

1. Federal courts-Injunction against strike-Suit by Govern-
ment-Norris-LaGuardia and Clayton Acts.-Jurisdiction of federal
court to enjoin strike in government-operated coal mines pending
judicial interpretation of contract with labor union. U. S. v. United
Mine Workers, 258.

2. Case or controversy-Hatch Act.-Suit of federal employees to
restrain enforcement of Hatch Act, alleging only their desire to engage
in prohibited political activity, not justiciable. United Public Work-
ers v. Mitchell, 75.

3. Id.-Suit of federal employee to restrain enforcement of Hatch
Act, alleging that he had violated Act and that the Civil Service
Commission had ordered his removal, was justiciable; propriety of
declaratory judgment action. United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 75.

4. Diversity jurisdiction.-State court judgment as adjudication on
merits barring relitigation in federal court. Angel v. Bullington,
183.

5. Scope of review.-Defendant who did not appeal from adverse
judgment in contempt proceedings may not raise objections on merits
of that judgment. Penfield Co. v. S. E. C., 585.

6. Scope of review-Labor Relations Act.-Scope of review of order
of Board under National Labor Relations Act. Packard Co. v. Labor
Board, 485.

7. Scope of review-Hatch Act-State as party aggrieved.-Right
of state to judicial review and to challenge constitutionality of order
of Civil Service Commission under Hatch Act. Oklahoma v. Civil
Service Comm'n, 127.

JURISDICTION-Continued.

II. Supreme Court.

1. Criminal Appeals Act-Direct appeal.-Dismissal of information
by District Court based on construction of Immigration Act appeal-
able directly to Supreme Court. U. S. v. Hoy, 724.

2. Direct appeal from three-judge court-Act of August 24, 1937-
Docketing. Where appeal not docketed within 60 days of allowance,
but appellee takes no steps under Rule 11 to dismiss, this Court has
jurisdiction. United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 75.

3. Review of C. C. A.-Certiorari.-Respondent may assert as
sustaining judgment ground rejected below. Walling v. General
Industries Co., 545.

4. Review of C. C. A.-Order of remand.-Circuit Court of Appeals'
remand to state court reviewable, though mandate has issued. Aetna
Casualty Co. v. Flowers, 464.

III. Circuit Courts of Appeals.

Scope of review-Findings of fact.-Findings of fact by District
Court, on conflicting evidence and inferences drawn therefrom, should
not be rejected unless clearly wrong. Walling v. General Industries
Co., 545.

IV. District Courts.

1. Suit against United States-Determination of jurisdiction.—Suit
against members of Maritime Commission as one of which District
Court, upon allegations of complaint, had jurisdiction to determine
jurisdiction by proceeding to decision on merits. Land v. Dollar, 731.

2. Diversity jurisdiction-Jurisdictional amount.-$5,000 suit under
Tennessee Workmen's Compensation Law involved jurisdictional
amount, though installments ultimately received might be less than
$3,000. Aetna Casualty Co. v. Flowers, 464.

3. Diversity jurisdiction-Forum non conveniens.-Power of fed-
eral court to dismiss upon doctrine of forum non conveniens; criteria
and propriety of application of doctrine. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert,
501; Koster v. Lumbermens Mutual Co., 518.

4. Id.-Application of doctrine of forum non conveniens to deriva-
tive suit. Koster v. Lumbermens Mutual Co., 518.

JURISDICTIONAL AMOUNT. See Jurisdiction, IV, 2.
JURY. See Trial, 3.

1;

LABOR. See also Antitrust Acts, 1-2; Constitutional Law, VI,
VII, 2-3; VIII, 2–3; Criminal Law, 1; Injunction, 1-2; Proce-
dure, 1-2; Workmen's Compensation, 1–2.

1. National Labor Relations Act-Effect on state regulation.-
State board's certification of union of foremen which National Board