Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

Merritt, James E., attorney, Morrison and Foerster, counsel to the Page Crocker National Bank of San Francisco__.

503

Prepared statement

494

Mitchell, Hon. Parren J., a Representative in Congress from the State of Maryland‒‒‒‒.

289

Prepared statement_.

289

Mosher, Hon. Charles A., a Representative in Congress from the
State of Ohio---.

62

Prepared statement

64

Rusk, Hon. Dean, former Secretary of State___

427

Shattuck, John H. F., national staff counsel, American Civil Liberties
Union

105

Prepared statement

106

Stark, Hon. Fortney H., a Representative in Congress from the State of California__.

483

Prepared statement

483

Terry, Robert H., Commissioner, Accounts, Collections, and Taxpayer
Service, IRS_

632

Whitaker, Meade, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service__ Wolfe, Singleton B., Assistant Commissioner, Compliance, IRS_ Additional material

632

632

"A Bankers Guide to IRS Procedures for Examinations of Customer
Records and Levies on Customer Accounts," by the American Bank-
ers Association__.

Caming, H. W. William, attorney, letter dated March 18, 1975, to
Bruce A. Lehman, counsel, House Committee on the Judiciary....
Cotter, William J., Chief Postal Inspector, letter and attachments
dated March 14, 1975, to Hon. Robert W. Kastenmeier____
Farris, Anthony J. P., U.S. attorney, Department of Justice, letter
dated December 17, 1974, to Hon. William Saxbe, Attorney General__
Financial Recordkeeping by banks, requirements under the Internal
Revenue Code____

"United States Treaties and Other International Agreements," vol. 23,
pt. 3, 1972.

504

227

330

415

648

76

Kastenmeier, Hon. Robert W., chairman, Subcommittee on Courts,
Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice, letter dated
March 21, 1975, to the President of the United States---
Mandelkern, Irwin, attorney, letter dated March 3, 1975, to House
Judiciary Committee_.

"Operational Guidelines for Compliance by Commercial Banks with the Treasury Regulations," by the American Bankers Association___ Right to Privacy-Recommendations of the House Republican Task Force on Privacy-

629

228

653

277

Task Force Report No. 9, Confidentiality and Third Parties, American
Psychiatric Association--

558

Appendixes-
Appendix 1:

Appendix 2:

Correspondence between the committee and the Department of
Justice

675

Reports of Federal agencies concerning electronic surveillance
made to the Attorney General for fiscal years 1973 and 1974---

[blocks in formation]

Memorandum on the Bill of Rights Procedures Act, Harvard Civil
Rights-Civil Liberties Research Committee___.

714

Appendix 6:

Personal Observations and Recommendations on Privacy, by
William C. Sullivan, former Assistant to the Director of the
FBI

724

Appendix 7:

Additional views of the Department of Justice-

729

Appendix 8:

Judicial Procedures for National Security Electronic Surveillance,
by the Association of the Bar of New York City-----

757

Appendix 9:

List and brief description of statutes authorizing the issuance of subpenas by administrative agencies of the Federal Government, American Law Division____.

Appendix 10:

Page

782

A Report of the 1974 Conference on Confidentiality of Health
Records, prepared by Natalie D. Spingarn___.

786

Appendix 11:

The IRS Summons and the Duty of Confidentiality:

A Hobson's Choice for Bankers-Revised, by Harold E.
Mortimer

849

Appendix 12:

Comparative Study on Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Laws in Major Foreign Countries, prepared by members of the staff of the Law Library, Library of Congress-.

855

Appendix 13:

Information supplied by the Public Citizen Litigation Group----Appendix 14:

950

Statement and information on FBI Security Index____ Appendix 15:

979

Correspondence with the Commissioner of Police, Baltimore, Md.. Appendix 16:

987

988

999

Additional information on telephone company monitoring-
Secrecy of Communications and Protection of Company Property,
Records and Services, C. & P. Telephone---.

Appendix 17:

Immunities, Rights, and Privileges Accorded Foreign Governments and Their Representatives in the United States, prepared by the Office of the Chief of Protocol, Department of State---- 1020

Appendix 18:

Newspaper Editorials on Surveillance Procedures___

Appendix 19:

1031

Excerpt From U.S. News & World Report, June 19, 1975‒‒‒‒‒‒‒__ 1033 Appendix 20-Supreme Court of the United States:

United States v. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan, et al-No. 70-153-Argued February 24, 1972;
Decided June 19, 1972__.

Opinion of Court, delivered by Mr. Justice Powell.
Concurring opinion, Mr. Justice Douglas.
Concurring opinion, Mr. Justice White..

1036

1038

1064

1074

Appendix 21-U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit:

Zweibon v. Mitchell__

1085

Appendix 22-Supreme Court of the United States:

United States et al. v. Bisceglia-No. 73-1245-Argued November 11-12, 1974: Decided February 19, 1975.

1216

Opinion of Court, delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Burger__.
Concurring opinion, Mr. Justices Blackmun and Powell_
Dissenting opinion, Mr. Justices Stewart and Douglas-----

1217

1227

1229

Appendix 23-Supreme Court of the United States:

California Bankers Association v. Shultz, Secretary of the
Treasury-No. 72-985-Argued January 16, 1974; Decided
April 1, 1974_.

1238

Opinion of Court, delivered by Mr. Justice Rehnquist.
Concurring opinion, Mr. Justices Powell and Blackmun.
Dissenting opinion, Mr. Justice Douglas.......

[blocks in formation]

Couch v. United States, et al.-No. 71-889-Argued November 14, 1972; Decided January 9, 1973.

[blocks in formation]

Appendix 25-U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit-September 13, 1974;

United States v. Miller, cite as 500 F.2d 751 (1974).

1352

Appendix 26:

Relevant statutes

1368

SURVEILLANCE

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 1975

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,

SUBCOMMITTEE ON COURTS, CIVIL LIBERTIES,

AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE OF THE
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY,

Washington, D.O. The subcommittee met at 10:10 a.m., pursuant to call, in room 2141, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Robert W. Kastenmeier [chairman of the subcommittee] presiding.

Present: Representatives Kastenmeier, Danielson, Drinan, Badillo, Railsback, Wiggins, and Cohen.

Also present: Bruce A. Lehman, counsel; Timothy A. Boggs, professional staff member; and Thomas E. Mooney, associate counsel. Mr. KASTEN MEIER. The subcommittee will come to order. The Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice is meeting this morning on the matter of wiretapping, electronic eavesdropping, and other surveillance conducted by the Government. In the past there have been occasional intermittent revelations of unethical conduct by Government investigators. However, in recent weeks and months we have been confronted with a plethora of revelations cascading upon us on almost a daily basis concerning secret surveillance and intelligence gathering reaching into the private lives of Americans.

Meanwhile congressional and public concern has been welling up about the stories of eavesdropping and snooping which fill our daily papers. Our job as a subcommittee is to learn what is happening and develop legislative remedies.

Much has been made about surveillance of public officials lately. However, the concern, the threat does not end there. For example, last year the Federal Bureau of Investigation admitted conducting surveillance of the mail of a 16-year-old New Jersey schoolgirl after she wrote a letter to the Socialist Workers Party as part of a class project. If this young woman is not secure from the Government spy, what can we assume about those more actively involved in the intellectual and political life of the Nation?

Of course, surveillance has not stopped with reading other people's mail. As testimony before this subcommittee last spring demonstrated, the forms of eavesdropping on private lives have included wiretapping of telephones, the use of surreptitious entry, and the bugging of homes.

(1)

The most insidious form of surveillance of all is the so-called warrantless wiretap or electronic surveillance which is conducted without the subject ever knowing that his privacy is being or has been invaded. And, warrantless wiretapping is normally conducted with regard to the subjects' political activities, raising the gravest questions of firstand fourth-amendment violations. It is warrantless wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping with all the variations made possible by modern technology which could form the cornerstone of a future police state.

On April 24, 26, and 29 of last year, our subcommittee began its inquiry with regard to surveillance by holding hearings on wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping. During those hearings the subcommittee heard a wide range of testimony, including that of Government witnesses such as Assistant Attorney General Henry Petersen, as well as spokesmen for the FBI and the Department of Defense. A former FBI agent turned private investigator, William Turner, testified about his knowledge of both Government and private snooping. Colleagues from the Congress also testified on over 13 different bills then pending in the subcommittee. We also heard from the chief security officer of the American Telephone and Telegraph Co., and two of the individuals who will appear here this morning, Attorneys Leon Friedman and John Shattuck. Unfortunately, we were unable to continue to examine the subject in greater detail because of the intervention of the full committee's impeachment inquiry, and the subsequent confirmation hearings for the Vice President.

However, neither public nor congressional interest in the question of surveillance has waned since we temporarily laid aside our inquiry. Within the month since the 94th Congress convened, more than 13 bills relating to surveillance with over 70 House sponsors have been introduced and referred to the subcommittee. Without objection, at this point these bills will be inserted in the record.

[The bills referred to follow:]

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »