Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act: Hearings Before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, Eighty-second Congress, First Session, on H.R. 3298, a Bill to Amend Section 503(b) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1951 - 229 lappuses Considers legislation to revise prescription drug dispensation regulations. |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 31.
. lappuse
... Larrick , George P. , Associate Commissioner , Food and Drug Admin- istration , Federal Security Agency Page 1 624 170 ཡང སྐྱབྱ 118 143 191 58 88 Sibley , George H. , vice president and general counsel , E. R. Squibb & Sons-- 183 ...
... Larrick , George P. , Associate Commissioner , Food and Drug Admin- istration , Federal Security Agency Page 1 624 170 ཡང སྐྱབྱ 118 143 191 58 88 Sibley , George H. , vice president and general counsel , E. R. Squibb & Sons-- 183 ...
87. lappuse
... Larrick . Gentlemen , the bell has rung for us to be present on the floor of the House ; so , we will recess the hearing at this time until 1:30 , when we hope to be able to make some progress . understand that the bills on the floor ...
... Larrick . Gentlemen , the bell has rung for us to be present on the floor of the House ; so , we will recess the hearing at this time until 1:30 , when we hope to be able to make some progress . understand that the bills on the floor ...
88. lappuse
... LARRICK . My name is George P. Larrick , Associate Commis- sioner of Food and Drugs . Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the committee : In the enforcement of the Federal Food , Drug , and Cosmetic Act our inspectors routinely investigate ...
... LARRICK . My name is George P. Larrick , Associate Commis- sioner of Food and Drugs . Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the committee : In the enforcement of the Federal Food , Drug , and Cosmetic Act our inspectors routinely investigate ...
95. lappuse
... LARRICK . Yes , sir . Mr. HELLER . Well , then , do you believe that the druggist in ques- tion had any doubt as to the dangerous character of this drug ? Mr. LARRICK . He should not have had , sir . Mr. HELLER . No doubt at all ? Mr.
... LARRICK . Yes , sir . Mr. HELLER . Well , then , do you believe that the druggist in ques- tion had any doubt as to the dangerous character of this drug ? Mr. LARRICK . He should not have had , sir . Mr. HELLER . No doubt at all ? Mr.
96. lappuse
... LARRICK . The present law , so far as it has been interpreted , is sufficient to protect the consumer . Mr. HELLER . Then would you please explain what additional pro- tection the consumer would have , under the new law , against the ...
... LARRICK . The present law , so far as it has been interpreted , is sufficient to protect the consumer . Mr. HELLER . Then would you please explain what additional pro- tection the consumer would have , under the new law , against the ...
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
adequate directions Administrative Procedure Act agency authority barbital barbiturates BECKWORTH Benzedrine bill caution CHAIRMAN circuit court CLUTTER committee Congress Cosmetic Act counter counts court of appeals dangerous drugs dentist Dexedrine dispensed doctor DOLLIVER Drug Administration drug manufacturers drug or device Drug Store efficacy EWING exemption FDC Act Federal Food Federal Security Federal Security Agency FISCHELIS Food and Drug Guilty HALE HARROP HESELTON LARRICK legislation licensed by law medicine misbranded narcotics Nembutal Nolo contendere O'HARA oral prescription Over-the-counter package patient pharmacist pharmacy phenobarbital physician Plea practice practitioner licensed prescriber prescription drug prescription legend prescription-drug law present law problem profession professional prohibited proposed provision public health question refilling of prescriptions regulations responsibility restriction Retail Druggists ROBERT CROSSER scription Seconal section 502 sell sold statement statute sulfadiazine Sulfathiazole supervision telephone prescriptions tion trial de novo veterinarian WALLER WARNACK WOLVERTON written prescription
Populāri fragmenti
211. lappuse - ... or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (6) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court.
8. lappuse - In making the foregoing determinations the court shall review the whole record or such portions thereof as may be cited by any party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error.
168. lappuse - States, from whom he purchases such articles, to the effect that the same is not adulterated or misbranded within the meaning of this Act, designating it.
168. lappuse - No person shall be subject to the penalties of sub-section (a) of this Section, for having violated Section 3 (a) or (c) of this Act if he established a guaranty or undertaking signed by, and containing the name and address of, the person residing in the United States from whom he received in good faith the article, to the effect that such article is not adulterated or mis-branded within the meaning of this Act, designating this Act.
227. lappuse - Secretary, after investigation, found to be, and by regulations designated as, habit forming; unless its label bears the name, and quantity or proportion of such substance or derivative and in juxtaposition therewith the statement "Warning May be habit forming.
36. lappuse - ... the United States court of appeals for the circuit wherein such person resides or has his principal place of business...
20. lappuse - Unless its labeling bears (1) adequate directions for use; and (2) such adequate warnings against use in those pathological conditions or by children where its use may be dangerous to health, or against unsafe dosage or methods or duration of administration or application, in such manner and form, as are necessary for the protection of users...
76. lappuse - ... because of its toxicity or other potentiality for harmful effect, or the method of its use, or the collateral measures necessary to its use...
212. lappuse - Whether on the record as a whole there is substantial evidence to support agency findings is a question which Congress has placed in the keeping of the Courts of Appeals. This Court will intervene only in what ought to be the rare instance when [during the appellate court proceeding] the standard appears to have been misapprehended or grossly misapplied.
168. lappuse - ... was made in good faith, unless he refuses to furnish on request of an officer or employee duly designated by the...