Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub
[graphic]

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

JAMES O. EASTLAND, Mississippi, Chairman

JOHN L. MCCLELLAN, Arkansas
SAM J. ERVIN, JR., North Carolina
THOMAS J. DODD, Connecticut
PHILIP A. HART, Michigan

EDWARD V. LONG, Missouri

EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts

BIRCH BAYH, Indiana

QUENTIN N. BURDICK, North Dakota JOSEPH D. TYDINGS, Maryland

GEORGE A. SMATHERS, Florida

EVERETT MCKINLEY DIRKSEN, Illinois
ROMAN L. HRUSKA, Nebraska
HIRAM L. FONG, Hawaii
HUGH SCOTT, Pennsylvania
JACOB K. JAVITS, New York

SUBCOMMITTEE ON PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, AND COPYRIGHTS

JOHN L. MCCLELLAN, Arkansas, Chairman

PHILIP A. HART, Michigan

QUENTIN N. BURDICK, North Dakota

HUGH SCOTT, Pennsylvania HIRAM L. FONG, Hawaii

II

THOMAS C. BRENNAN, Chief Counsel

CONTENTS

Paul A. Porter, on behalf of organized baseball..

162

[blocks in formation]

COPYRIGHT LAW REVISION-CATV

TUESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1966

U.S. SENATE,

SUBCOMMITTEE ON PATENTS,

TRADEMARKS, AND COPYRIGHTS

OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY,

Washington, D.C. The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10 a.m., in room 1318, New Senate Office Building, Senator Quentin N. Burdick presiding. Present: Senators Burdick (presiding), McClellan, Hart, and Fong.

Also present: Thomas C. Brennan, chief counsel; Edd N. Williams, Jr., assistant counsel; and Stephen G. Haaser, chief clerk, Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights.

Senator BURDICK. The subcommittee this morning is resuming the public hearing on S. 1006, to provide for a general revision of the copyright laws. This series of hearings will consider the copyright implications of community antenna television systems.

The distinguished chairman of the subcommittee has appointed me as the acting chairman for the purpose of conducting these hearings. I shall direct that a copy of a letter from Chairman McClellan appear in the record immediately following these remarks.

The subcommittee commenced hearings on this bill during the first session. It was the hope of the subcommittee that the current Congress could complete action on the entire revision bill. Despite the diligent efforts of the Copyright Office, the House Judiciary Subcommittee, and the interested parties, it has now become apparent that this will not be possible.

Important decisions relating to various aspects of CATV are currently being made in the Congress, the Federal Communications Commission, and the Federal courts. These developments cannot be deferred until a future Congress enacts a general copyright revision bill, yet whatever decision the Congress ultimately makes concerning the copyright question will have a significanut impact upon CATV operations. Under these circumstances, the chairman of the subcommittee has recommended that the subcommittee explore the advisability of action in this session of Congress to resolve the CATV copyright question. If, however, the subcommittee should determine not to act separately on the CATV issue, then these proceedings will be of assistance to the subcommittee when, in the next Congress, it acts upon the entire copyright revision program.

At the outset of these hearings, I wish to indicate that I have no predetermined view concerning this issue. I am confident that the subcommittee will seek a proper balance between the constitutional objective of the copyright system to encourage creativity, and the public interest in providing for the widest possible dissemination of information.

1

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »