...Commission. But the objectives of the legislation have remained substantially unaltered since 1927. Congress moved under the spur of a widespread fear...monopolistic domination in the broadcasting field. To avoid this Congress provided for a system of permits and licenses. Licenses were not to be granted...

...this point very specifically. In the Pottsville case, Mr. Justice Frankfurter alluded to the fact that Congress moved under the spur of a widespread fear...monopolistic domination in the broadcasting field — and that — To avoid this Congress provided for a system of permits and licenses. The Sanders...

...Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co., 309 US 134, 137, the Court said : Congress moved under the spur of a widespread fear...monopolistic domination in the broadcasting field. To avoid this Congress provided for a system of permits and licenses. While many of the network practices...

...pertinent. This was the opinion rendered January 29, 1940, in the Pottsville Broadcasting Co. case: Congress moved under the spur of a widespread fear...of governmental control the public interest might he subordinated to monopolistic domination in the broadcasting field. To avoid this, Congress provided...

...the public interest. But Congress was acting in a field of regulation which was both new and dynamic. "Congress moved under the spur of a widespread fear...monopolistic domination In the broadcasting field." Federal Cotnmvnicritionn Comm'n v. Pottxrillc Hroaricnxlinfl Co., 309 TJ. S. 134, 137. In the context...

...the public interest. But Congress was acting in a field of regulation which was both new and dynamic. "Congress moved under the spur of a widespread fear...monopolistic domination in the broadcasting field." Federal Communications Comm'n v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co., 309 US 134, 137. In the context of the...

...the public interest. But Congress was acting in a field of regulation which was both new and dynamic. "Congress moved under the spur of a widespread fear...monopolistic domination in the broadcasting field" (Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co., 309 US 134, 137). In the context...

...regulating radio and television broadcasting, was to guard against this possibility. In adopting this act Congress "moved under the spur of a widespread fear...monopolistic domination in the broadcasting field." 4 Unlike other regulated industries, broadcasting is not subject to governmental control of rates,...

...Pottsville Broadcaxting Co., 300 US 134, 137, Congress in setting up the Communications Act of 1934 "moved under the spur of a widespread fear that in...monopolistic domination in the broadcasting field." As the Supreme Court further pointed out in Federal Communication« Commission v. Sanders Brothers...

...regulating radio and television broadcasting, was to guard against this possibility. In adopting this act Congress "moved under the spur of a widespread fear...monopolistic domination in the broadcasting field." Unlike other regulated industries, broadcasting is not subject to governmental control of rates, prices,...