Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1918 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 84.
7. lappuse
... present application , seems to be impossible without forcing upon the terms of the count a meaning which robbed them of their sense , and this is true of the claims ap- pealed , as indicated above . As to the question of division , it ...
... present application , seems to be impossible without forcing upon the terms of the count a meaning which robbed them of their sense , and this is true of the claims ap- pealed , as indicated above . As to the question of division , it ...
15. lappuse
... presents itself , what is the bearing upon the bar of prior invention of the rule , which is so well settled with reference to anticipation , that knowledge of the anticipating inven- tion must be accessible to the public ? The bare ...
... presents itself , what is the bearing upon the bar of prior invention of the rule , which is so well settled with reference to anticipation , that knowledge of the anticipating inven- tion must be accessible to the public ? The bare ...
20. lappuse
... present inquiry because it would prove too much . It is contrary to many other decisions , among which may be particularly cited Barnes Automatic Sprinkler Co. v . Walworth Mfg . Co. ( 60 Fed . Rep . , 605 ) . American Roll Paper Co. v ...
... present inquiry because it would prove too much . It is contrary to many other decisions , among which may be particularly cited Barnes Automatic Sprinkler Co. v . Walworth Mfg . Co. ( 60 Fed . Rep . , 605 ) . American Roll Paper Co. v ...
21. lappuse
... present . It does not appear what was the precise situation presented with reference to the patents here referred to . The decision was addressed to the question of anticipation and contained no reference to the defense of prior ...
... present . It does not appear what was the precise situation presented with reference to the patents here referred to . The decision was addressed to the question of anticipation and contained no reference to the defense of prior ...
33. lappuse
... present practice . I consider that an application should be re- jected on a copending patent , under Rule 75 , if an interference in fact , based upon the claims in the application and the subject - matter disclosed in the patent which ...
... present practice . I consider that an application should be re- jected on a copending patent , under Rule 75 , if an interference in fact , based upon the claims in the application and the subject - matter disclosed in the patent which ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abandoned affirmed alleged amend anticipation apparatus appellant's appellee application Assistant Commissioner cancelation carbon pile Circuit Court combination Commissioner of Patents Company construction cottonseed oil counts Court of Appeals Decided decision decree defendant descriptive device disclosed disclosure District Court District of Columbia Electric elements entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief extending fact filed glycerids granted held infringement interference proceeding invention in controversy inventor involved issue jurisdiction lever machine manufacture mark matter McAfee means mechanical ment metal motion operation opinion opposition proceedings original party patent in suit patent law Patent Office perforated petition petitioner plaintiff plate Primary Examiner prior art prior invention priority of invention question reason reduction to practice reference refused registration reissue res adjudicata rheostat rule specification subject-matter substantially supra testimony tion Topliff trade trade-mark tribunals tube United vention word writ of mandamus
Populāri fragmenti
248. lappuse - ... or more than two years prior to his application, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years...
248. lappuse - ... not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, and not in public use or on sale for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceedings had, obtain a patent therefor.
91. lappuse - Such oath may be made before any person within the United States authorized by law to administer oaths, or, when the applicant resides in a foreign country, before any minister, charge d'affaires, consul, or commercial agent holding commission under the Government of the United States...
32. lappuse - That he was not the original and first inventor or discoverer of any material and substantial part of the thing patented; or, Fifth.
347. lappuse - That whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States shall hereafter be used or manufactured by or for the United States...
105. lappuse - Whenever an application is made for a patent which, in the opinion of the Commissioner, would interfere with any pending application, or with any unexpired patent, he shall give notice thereof to the applicants, or applicant and patentee, as the case may be. The question of priority of invention...
186. lappuse - That no mark which consists merely in the name of an individual, firm, corporation, or association, not written, printed, impressed, or woven in some particular or distinctive manner or in association with a portrait of the individual, or merely in words or devices which are descriptive of the goods with which they are used, or of the character or quality of such goods, or merely a geographical name or term, shall be registered under the terms of this act...
189. lappuse - That no mark by which the goods of the owner of the mark may be distinguished from other goods of the same class...
248. lappuse - ... not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before his invention or discovery thereof...
190. lappuse - ... which so nearly resemble a registered or known trademark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers...