CASES CITED. [Decisions of the State Courts are indicated by a section mark (§); of the United States District Courts by the letter b; of the United States Circuit Courts by the letter ; of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia by one star (*); of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals by the letter d; and of the Supreme Court of the United States by two stars (**).] A. ** Abercrombie et al. v. Baldwin et al., 245 U. S., 198_ Acetylene Gas Case, 192 Fed. Rep., 321___ Acker, Merrall & Condit Company. Ex parte, C. D., 1911, 54; 165 O. G., 473 * Adams v. Murphy, 18 App. D. C., 172_ Adams-Jewell Co., 120 MS. Dec., 374_. § Aetna Ins. Co. v. Commonwealth, 106 Ky., 864 'Ajax Metal Co. v. Brady Brass Co., 155 Fed. Rep., 409– Alaska Gold Mining Co. v. Keating, 116 Fed. Rep., 561 Page. 44, 266 243 52 171 49 375 18, 227 149 *Allen et al. v. United States, 22 App. D. C., 271--- 73 278 Alvord v. Smith & Watson Iron Works, 216 Fed. Rep., 150_ 18, 19, 227 43, 44 American Fibre Chamois Co. v. DeLee et al., 67 Fed. Rep., 329_. * American Roll Paper Co. v. Weston, 45 Fed. Rep., 686_. 347 ཚ སྒོམ 20 Ams. * Ams. In re, 29 App. D. C., 91- Anderson v. Collins, 122 Fed. Rep., 451_ * American Stove Co. v. Detroit Stove Works, 31 App. D. C., 304__. Ex parte, C. D., 1906, 424; 125 O. G., 347– 202 43 43 18, 227, 229 Aspegren and Company. Ex parte, C. D., 1902, 265; 100 O. G., 684_. 'Automatic Co. v. Pneumatic Co., 166 Fed. Rep., 288_ Baker & Co., Walter v. Delapenha, 160 Fed. Rep., 746_. 376 "Baldwin v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., (Justrite Mfg. Co.,) 227 Fed. Rep., 455. 330 "Baldwin v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (Justrite Mfg. Co.,), 228 Fed. Rep., 895_ 330 "Baldwin v. Grier Bros. Co., 210 Fed. Rep., 560__ 330 330 331, 334 73 217 IX Page. * Barclay v. Schuler, 41 App. D. C., 250-- 142 Barnes Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Walworth Mfg. Co., 60 Fed. Rep., * Barratt v. Duell, Commissioner of Patents, 14 App. D. C., 255. ** Bauer, v. O'Donnell, 229 U. S., 1. 65 311 148 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 227, 229, 250 349, 350 § Bear Lithia Springs Co. v. Great Bear Spring Co., 71 N. J. Eq., 595____ 203 8 Bear Lithia Springs Co. v. Great Bear Spring Co., 72 N. J. Eq., 871_-. * Beckwith. In re estate of P. D., 48 App. D. C., 110_ ** Belknap v. Schild, 161 U. S., 10__ ** Bement v. National Harrow Company, 186 U. S., 70_. * Beswick. In re, 16 App. D. C., 345__-. Bevin Bros. Mfg. Co. v. Starr, etc., 114 Fed. Rep., 362_ ** Bierce, L'd., Wm. W., v. Hutchins, 205 U. S., 340 Birmingham v. Kirwan, 2 Schoales & Lefr., 442.. 203 62 340 206, 374 160 51 245 245 137 79, 80 330 80 278 Black et al v. Ehrich et al., 44 Fed. Rep., 793_ Black Betsy Coal & Mining Company v. The W. J. Hamilton Coal Com pany, C. D., 1913, 264; 197 O. G., 998 Bleser v. Baldwin, 199 Fed. Rep., 133. Bloomington. Ex parte, C. D., 1905, 543; 119 O. G., 2235 Blount v. Société Anonyme, etc., 53 Fed. Rep., 98__ * Bluthenthal et al v. Bigbee Bros. & Co., 33 App. D. C., 209_ ** Bobbs-Merrill Company v. Straus, 210 U. S., 339. d Borden Ice Cream Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co., 201 Fed. Rep., 510. *Bourn v. Hill, Jr., 27 App. D. C., 291– **Brinkerhoff v. Aloe, 146 U. S., 515_ Brown. Ex parte, C. D., 1917, 22; 235 O. G., 1355_. * Brown, v. Campbell, 41 App. D. C., 499_ ** Brown v. Fletcher, 237 U. S., 583_ ** Brown v. Guild, 23 Wall., 181 ** Brown v. Piper, 91 U. S., 37– ** Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U. S., 540__. d Budd Co. v. New England Co., 240 Fed. Rep., 415 **Butterworth v. Hoe, 112 U. S., 50‒‒‒‒‒ Byron Weston Company. Ex parte, C. D., 1902, 149; 99 O. G., 861_-. C. 80, 204 348, 349 134 142 368 44, 45 128, 171 356 19, 23 279 183 231 98, 314 52 ** Canal Company v. Clark, 13 Wall., 311. 53, 370, 374, 375 d Canda v. Michigan Co., 124 Fed. Rep., 486_. 267 * Canton Culvert & Silo Co. v. Consolidated Car Heating Co., 44 App. D. C., 491. 135 * Carlin v. Goldberg, 45 App. D. C., 540. 136 **Carnegie v. Cambria, 185 U. S., 403_ 273 Carr v. Schollhorn v. Warren, etc., 104 MS. Dec., 449_ § Chadwick v. Covell, 151 Mass., 190_. ** Chicago & N. W. Railroad Co. v. Sayles, 97 U. S., 554_. C 243 195, 264 70 Page. Clemens v. Belford, 14 Fed. Rep., 728. Cleveland Co. v. Detroit Co., 131 Fed. Rep., 853_ 4 Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Diamond Rubber Co., 157 Fed. Rep., 137 264 124 370, 376 228 278 Coombs Milling Company v. Barber Milling Company, C. D., 1911, 27; 163 O. G., 727-- 58 31 253 ** Corn Planter Patent Case, 23 Wall., 181. "Corona Chemical Company v. Latimer Chemical Co., 240 Fed. Rep., 423_ * Cosper v. Gold, 34 App. D. C., 194_. * Cosper v. Gold and Gold, 36 App. D. C., 302_- 136, 147, 166 38, 41, 265 ** Cramp & Sons, Co., William v. Curtis Turbine Co., 234 U. S., 755‒‒‒‒‒‒ ** Cramp & Sons Company, William, v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co., 228 U. S., 645_. 337 337, 356 ** Cramp & Sons Company, William, v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Co., 246 U. S., 28- 356 Cravenette Co., The, v. Rogers & Thompson, 102 MS. Dec., 127_ 67, 68, 69, 70, 71 ** Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S., 351_ 204 ** Crozier v. Krupp, 224 U. S., 290_. 336, 340, 342, 354, 356 Curtis Turbine Co. v. Wm. Cramp & Sons, 202 Fed. Rep., 932. 337 337 130 d Curtis Turbine Co. v. Wm. Cramp & Sons Co., 211 Fed. Rep., 124_. * Cutler v. Leonard, 31 App. D. C., 297_. D. De Voe Snuff Co. v. Wolff, 206 Fed. Rep., 420. 'D'Arcy v. Staples & Hanford Co., 161 Fed. Rep., 733 ** Dable Grain Shovel Co. v. Flint, 137 U. S., 41. ** Daniels v. Tearney, 102 U. S., 415_ d De Jonge & Co. v. Breuker & Kessler Co., 182 Fed. Rep., 150_. 237 252 206 50, 67 301 Diamond Drill Co. v. Kelley Bros., 120 Fed. Rep., 282_ 18, 22, d Drewson v. Hartje Mfg. Co., 131 Fed. Rep., 734___ 16, 19, 23, 25, 28, 29, 227, 228 ** DuBois v. Kirk, 158 U. S., 58_ *Eastman v. Houston, 18 App. D. C., 135_ Eck v. Kutz, 132 Fed. Rep., 758_. Eddleblute. Ex parte, C. D., 1890, 124; 52 O. G., 751– * Edison v. Thomas A. Edison, Jr., Chemical Co., 128 Fed. Rep., 1013_ * Einstein v. Sawhill, 2 App. D. C., 10‒‒‒‒‒ Eiseman v. Schiffer, 157 Fed. Rep., 473_. Page. d Electric Controller & S. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co., 171 Fed. Rep., 83_. 19, 23, 25, 28, 29, 221, 227 182 115, * Electro Steel Co. v. Lindenberg Steel Co., 43 App. D. C., 270__ ** Elizabeth v. Pavement Co., 97 U. S., 126. * Engel v. Sinclair, 34 App. D. C., 212_ Erne and Bridges. Ex parte, C. D., 1897, 197; 81 O. G., 2247– Essor Company. Ex parte, 122 MS. Dec., 366–– ** Ewing v. 183, 185, 206 247, 250 298 56 83 97, 211, 213 180 Faulkner. Ex parte, C. D., 1907, 136; 128 O. G., 886_ 230 37 2 43 * Fischbeck Soap Co. v. Kleeno Mfg. Co., 44 App. D. C., 6. d Florence Mfg. Co. v. Dowd, 178 Fed. Rep., 73– ** Florsheim v. Schilling, 137 U. S., 64-‒‒‒ *Foster v. Antisdel, 14 App. D. C., 552_ Fraim Co. v. Reading Co., C. D., 1909, 29; 140 O. G., 255__. d Freeman Electric Co., E. H., v. Johns-Pratt Co., 204 Fed. Rep., 288_. * Fritts. General Electric Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Co., 190 Fed. Rep., 165--- ** Gaylor v. Wilder, 51 U. S., 477- C d General Electric Co. v. Cooper Hewitt Electric Co., 249 Fed. Rep., 69_. d General Electric Company v. Steinberger, 214 Fed. Rep., 784. Georgia v. Bilfinger et al., 129 Fed. Rep., 131__ Germ Milling Company, Limited, v. Robinson, 3 Rep. Pat. Cas., 399_ b Globe Knitting works v. Segal et al., 239 Fed. Rep., 322_ d Goessling Box Co. v. Gumb, et al., 241 Fed. Rep., 674_ *Gold. In re, 38 App. D. C., 544_ * Gold. In re, 45 App. D. C., 294_ Gold v. Gold, 181 Fed. Rep., 544. d Gold v. Gold, 187 Fed. Rep., 273 *Gold v. Gold, 34 App. D. C., 229.... 206 206 197, 198 142 243 18, 19, 227 268 314 1 71 250 255 18 312 312 311 311 212, 213, 311 115, 316 158 d 'Gold and Gold Car Heating & Lighting Company v. Newton, Commissioner of Patents, 254 Fed. Rep., 824 *Goodrich Drug Co. v. Cassada Mfg. Co., 46 App. D. C., 146. |