Labor Union Insurance: Hearings Before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-fifth Congress, First Session, October 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, and 19, 1977U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
Actuarial Administrator affidavit Arizona Arthur Coia assets attorney benefits Bernard Rubin Brian Kavanagh Carney Carriers Welfare Fund cash Chairman claims Coia commissions consultant Council of Laborers dated District Council Exhibit Family Provider Farmers National filed Florida FNLISC George Wuagneux Golden Horn North GRAY group permanent HALFORD HANNA Hauser group Health and Welfare Herrera Hod Carriers Welfare Indiana State District Insurance Agency Insurance Company Insurance Department International Union investigation Joe Hauser John Boden Joseph Hauser July labor union Laborers and Hod Len Teeuws loan MALONE meeting Miami million MORRIS mortgages National Bank National Financial Agency National Life Insurance Old Security paid Paul Fosco payments percent permanent life insurance premium record reinsurance agreement Sage Corp Security Life Insurance Senator CHILES Senator NUNN Senator PERCY STEINBERG Stephen Weiss Stolpen subcommittee Teeuws testimony Tricario union trust funds Vaccaro WALSH whole life insurance
Populāri fragmenti
364. lappuse - COPYRIGHT ASSIGNMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One ($1.00) Dollar and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged...
379. lappuse - Do you swear the testimony you will give before this Subcommittee will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God. Mr.
5. lappuse - ... the continued well-being and security of millions of employees and their dependents are directly affected by these plans; that they are affected with a national public interest...
314. lappuse - (a} Whoever violates any provision of section 1962 of this chapter shall be fined not more than $25,000 or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall forfeit to the United States (1) any interest he has acquired or maintained in violation of section 1962...
5. lappuse - The preamble to the statute states that the statute seeks to protect: the interests of participants in employee benefit plans and their beneficiaries, by requiring the disclosure and reporting to participants and beneficiaries of financial and other information with respect...
149. lappuse - ... no testimony or other information compelled under the order (or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information) may be used against the witness in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order.
393. lappuse - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be signed by their duly authorized corporate officers and their corporate seals to be hereunto affixed the day and year first above written.
597. lappuse - ... may investigate such claim and interpose, at its own expense, in the proceeding where such claim is to be adjudicated, any defense or defenses which it may deem available to the ceding insurer or its liquidator or receiver or statutory successor.
543. lappuse - ... your permission, I would like to present for the record the statement of Harper Gardner, who represents the trustees of the two water districts in the city of Pueblo. Mr. Gardner was in the city last week. He and his wife were unfortunate enough to have an attack of nausea and had to return to Pueblo. We would like to have that made a part of the record. Another statement by George Everett, who is president of the conservation district in the upper Arkansas Valley.
314. lappuse - ... shall forfeit to the United States (1) any interest he has acquired or maintained in violation of section 1962, and (2) any interest in, security of, claim against, or property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of influence over, any enterprise which he has established, operated, controlled, conducted, or participated in the conduct of, in violation of section 1962.