Outline of Patent Office Interference PracticeUnited States Law Printing Office, 1966 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 49.
2. lappuse
... Patent Office of the claims involved , and the Commissioner may issue a patent to the applicant who is adjudged the prior inventor . " Thus the object of such a proceeding is to determine the question of priority of invention . And ...
... Patent Office of the claims involved , and the Commissioner may issue a patent to the applicant who is adjudged the prior inventor . " Thus the object of such a proceeding is to determine the question of priority of invention . And ...
46. lappuse
... priority is not determinable . As to the first of these grounds , see supra , pp . 13-18 , inc . , 29 ; Seidman and ... invention , see Passal , supra . That the count was drawn to a non - elected invention was not available before the ...
... priority is not determinable . As to the first of these grounds , see supra , pp . 13-18 , inc . , 29 ; Seidman and ... invention , see Passal , supra . That the count was drawn to a non - elected invention was not available before the ...
79. lappuse
... priority of invention , the Board of Patent Interferences will consider only pri- ority of invention on the evidence submitted . Questions of patentability of a claim generally will not be con- sidered in the decision on priority ; and ...
... priority of invention , the Board of Patent Interferences will consider only pri- ority of invention on the evidence submitted . Questions of patentability of a claim generally will not be con- sidered in the decision on priority ; and ...
Saturs
Introduction | xlvii |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment Junior Party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office pending petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question reasons of appeal record reduction to practice Requisites res adjudicata Rule 94 senior specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion