Outline of Patent Office Interference PracticeUnited States Law Printing Office, 1966 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 16.
105. lappuse
... means in somewhat different terms . Proposed Count F is a modification of Count 4 defining the securing means more specifically . The proposed counts , which are set forth in an amend- ment to the application of the Senior Party filed ...
... means in somewhat different terms . Proposed Count F is a modification of Count 4 defining the securing means more specifically . The proposed counts , which are set forth in an amend- ment to the application of the Senior Party filed ...
107. lappuse
... means and omits the " whereby " or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however , the same general definition of clamping means , namely , " means resiliently clampingly securing said panels to said support bar " , etc ...
... means and omits the " whereby " or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however , the same general definition of clamping means , namely , " means resiliently clampingly securing said panels to said support bar " , etc ...
122. lappuse
... means as defined in the said interference counts . 10. The Board erred in failing to find that the appli- cation of the said senior party does not disclose automat- ically controlled means as defined in the interference counts . 11 ...
... means as defined in the said interference counts . 10. The Board erred in failing to find that the appli- cation of the said senior party does not disclose automat- ically controlled means as defined in the interference counts . 11 ...
Saturs
Introduction | xlvii |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment Junior Party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office pending petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question reasons of appeal record reduction to practice Requisites res adjudicata Rule 94 senior specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion