Outline of Patent Office Interference PracticeUnited States Law Printing Office, 1966 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 22.
17. lappuse
... interpreted as broadly as its language will permit . The interpretation must be reasonable , however , and may not be extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate . 1 Ludwig v . Sohn , 324 F.2d 1004 ( CCPA 1963 ) ...
... interpreted as broadly as its language will permit . The interpretation must be reasonable , however , and may not be extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate . 1 Ludwig v . Sohn , 324 F.2d 1004 ( CCPA 1963 ) ...
18. lappuse
... interpreted so broadly as to depart from the construction which was given it when it was allowed over the prior art ... interpreting " surround " ; Mantz v . Kronmiller , 168 F.2d 100 ( CCPA 1948 ) interpreting " latch means " ; Wirkler ...
... interpreted so broadly as to depart from the construction which was given it when it was allowed over the prior art ... interpreting " surround " ; Mantz v . Kronmiller , 168 F.2d 100 ( CCPA 1948 ) interpreting " latch means " ; Wirkler ...
19. lappuse
... interpret the count , such testimony is admissible as to utility , i.e. , adequacy of disclosure , in- herency , and ... interpreted as it was in the proceedings resulting in the issuance of the patent ; i.e. , the meaning of the issue ...
... interpret the count , such testimony is admissible as to utility , i.e. , adequacy of disclosure , in- herency , and ... interpreted as it was in the proceedings resulting in the issuance of the patent ; i.e. , the meaning of the issue ...
Saturs
Introduction | xlvii |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment Junior Party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office pending petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question reasons of appeal record reduction to practice Requisites res adjudicata Rule 94 senior specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion