Outline of Patent Office Interference PracticeUnited States Law Printing Office, 1966 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 26.
46. lappuse
... ground of canceled Rule 232 ( a ) , see Renz v . Jacob , 326 F. 2d 792 ( CCPA 1964 ) . As to the question of interference in fact see Seidman and Horwitz , Sec . 232 : 10 ; and , supra , pp . 7 , 9 , note 4 . Dissolution on the ground ...
... ground of canceled Rule 232 ( a ) , see Renz v . Jacob , 326 F. 2d 792 ( CCPA 1964 ) . As to the question of interference in fact see Seidman and Horwitz , Sec . 232 : 10 ; and , supra , pp . 7 , 9 , note 4 . Dissolution on the ground ...
47. lappuse
... ground for dissolution . So have improper sugges- tion of claims to an adversary , 5 matters requiring the tak- ing of testimony , extraneous matters based on ex parte affidavits.R An interference party will be mindful that upon disso ...
... ground for dissolution . So have improper sugges- tion of claims to an adversary , 5 matters requiring the tak- ing of testimony , extraneous matters based on ex parte affidavits.R An interference party will be mindful that upon disso ...
120. lappuse
... ground that his adversary is not entitled to make the claim , to a decision of the Board of Interference Ex- aminers upon that ground as an incident to the decision upon priority of invention at final hearing . There is noth- ing in the ...
... ground that his adversary is not entitled to make the claim , to a decision of the Board of Interference Ex- aminers upon that ground as an incident to the decision upon priority of invention at final hearing . There is noth- ing in the ...
Saturs
Introduction | xlvii |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment Junior Party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office pending petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question reasons of appeal record reduction to practice Requisites res adjudicata Rule 94 senior specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion