Outline of Patent Office Interference PracticeUnited States Law Printing Office, 1966 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 54.
50. lappuse
... decision of the primary examiner on a motion to shift the burden of proof , unlike his decisions on other motions , is not final . As has been held , such a decision merely determines which of the parties may prima facie be considered ...
... decision of the primary examiner on a motion to shift the burden of proof , unlike his decisions on other motions , is not final . As has been held , such a decision merely determines which of the parties may prima facie be considered ...
55. lappuse
... decision complained of , may be dis- missed as untimely . Any reply thereto must be filed within 10 days from the filing of the petition . " " A decision granting a motion for judgment on the record is appealable as a final order , but ...
... decision complained of , may be dis- missed as untimely . Any reply thereto must be filed within 10 days from the filing of the petition . " " A decision granting a motion for judgment on the record is appealable as a final order , but ...
85. lappuse
... decision rendered prior to January 1 , 1953 , was six months . As to service and notice and jurisdiction of the court in cases involving a patentee , see 35 USC 293. A defeated pat- entee had no such right of action under R.S. 4915. See ...
... decision rendered prior to January 1 , 1953 , was six months . As to service and notice and jurisdiction of the court in cases involving a patentee , see 35 USC 293. A defeated pat- entee had no such right of action under R.S. 4915. See ...
Saturs
Introduction | xlvii |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment Junior Party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office pending petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question reasons of appeal record reduction to practice Requisites res adjudicata Rule 94 senior specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion