Outline of Patent Office Interference PracticeUnited States Law Printing Office, 1966 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 34.
40. lappuse
... considered , and when one of the parties to the inter- ference is a patentee , no motion to dissolve on the ground that the subject matter of the count is un- patentable to all parties or is unpatentable to the patentee will be considered ...
... considered , and when one of the parties to the inter- ference is a patentee , no motion to dissolve on the ground that the subject matter of the count is un- patentable to all parties or is unpatentable to the patentee will be considered ...
51. lappuse
have been once considered by the primary examiner will not be considered . " Thus , there is no motion period in an interference de- clared on motion in a previous interference.1 Motions ; Procedure Generally All such motions , i.e. ...
have been once considered by the primary examiner will not be considered . " Thus , there is no motion period in an interference de- clared on motion in a previous interference.1 Motions ; Procedure Generally All such motions , i.e. ...
79. lappuse
... considered are stated in Rule 258 : 2 " ( a ) In determining priority of invention , the Board of Patent Interferences will consider only pri- ority of invention on the evidence submitted . Questions of patentability of a claim ...
... considered are stated in Rule 258 : 2 " ( a ) In determining priority of invention , the Board of Patent Interferences will consider only pri- ority of invention on the evidence submitted . Questions of patentability of a claim ...
Saturs
Introduction | xlvii |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment Junior Party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office pending petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question reasons of appeal record reduction to practice Requisites res adjudicata Rule 94 senior specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion