Copyright Office/Copyright Royalty Tribunal: hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-eighth Congress, first session, on Copyright Office/Copyright Royalty Tribunal, March 3, 1983U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 15.
49. lappuse
... testified before this subcommittee in 1981 that : It is our view that central to the consideration of this issue is the finding of Con- gress in 1976 that " it would be impractical and unduly burdensome " to require the operators of ...
... testified before this subcommittee in 1981 that : It is our view that central to the consideration of this issue is the finding of Con- gress in 1976 that " it would be impractical and unduly burdensome " to require the operators of ...
50. lappuse
... testified on April 29 , 1981 , before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary that there is absolutely no empirical economic justification for the statutory schedule . Our review of the public legislative history in the Senate , where the ...
... testified on April 29 , 1981 , before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary that there is absolutely no empirical economic justification for the statutory schedule . Our review of the public legislative history in the Senate , where the ...
56. lappuse
... testified before this subcommittee in 1981 that : It is our view that central to the consideration of this issue is the finding of Congress in 1976 that ' it would be im- practical and unduly burdensome ' to require the operators of ...
... testified before this subcommittee in 1981 that : It is our view that central to the consideration of this issue is the finding of Congress in 1976 that ' it would be im- practical and unduly burdensome ' to require the operators of ...
57. lappuse
... testified on April 29 , 1981 before the Senate Committee on material . " the Judiciary that " there is absolutely no empirical economic justification for the statutory schedule . " Our review of the public legislative history in the ...
... testified on April 29 , 1981 before the Senate Committee on material . " the Judiciary that " there is absolutely no empirical economic justification for the statutory schedule . " Our review of the public legislative history in the ...
70. lappuse
... testified that the statutory royalty fee schedule was not based on any supporting data or economic analysis , but ... testified that these major changes in the cable industry are factors to be considered by the Tribunal in its ...
... testified that the statutory royalty fee schedule was not based on any supporting data or economic analysis , but ... testified that these major changes in the cable industry are factors to be considered by the Tribunal in its ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
97th Congress additional distant signal Barney Frank Betamax bill Brennan broadcast signals cable compulsory license cable copyright cable industry cable operators Cable Royalty Distribution cable systems cable television Cable Television Association cable's Commissioner committee compulsory license copy Copyright Act copyright law Copyright Office copyright owners Copyright Royalty Tribunal Counsel Court of Appeals Dan Lungren decision deregulation determination distant signal equivalent effective date exemption FCC's Federal Communications Commission Federal Register fee schedule first-sale doctrine increase KASTENMEIER KOKI KOKI-TV LADD legislative Library March 15 marketplace MAZZOLI MPAA National Cable Television NCTA NCTA's November 19 off-air taping payment percent photocopying presented Proceeding CRT Docket program suppliers Proposed Findings rate adjustment record repeal request resale carriers result revenue Royalty Distribution Proceeding royalty fees royalty rate satellite SAWYER secondary transmissions Senate statement statutory subcommittee subscribers syndicated exclusivity rules syndicated programming teletext testified testimony Tribunal's
Populāri fragmenti
69. lappuse - Commission or by an appropriate governmental authority of Canada or Mexico and embodying a performance or display of a work is actionable as an act of infringement under section 501, and is fully subject to the remedies provided by sections...
70. lappuse - ... of 1 per centum of such gross receipts for the fifth distant signal equivalent and each additional distant signal equivalent thereafter...
6. lappuse - That constitutional provision is Art. I, § 8, cl. 8, which empowers Congress "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
26. lappuse - ... carrier who has no direct or indirect control over the content or selection of the primary transmission or over the particular recipients of the secondary transmission, and whose activities with respect to the secondary transmission consist solely of providing wires, cables, or other communications channels for the use of others : Provided, That the provisions of this clause extend only to the activities of said carrier with respect to secondary transmissions and do not exempt from liability...
25. lappuse - ... is actionable as an act of infringement under section 501, and is fully subject to the remedies provided by sections 502 through 506 and 509, if the primary transmission is not made, for reception by the public at large but is controlled and limited to reception by particular members of the public...
8. lappuse - ... voluntary, but it is a prerequisite to the initiation of an infringement suit. Other advantages are attached to registration, and in the fiscal year ending September 30, 1982, some 468,149 registrations were made. Even though registration is voluntary, the law contains a mandatory deposit requirement for all works published in the United States with a notice of copyright. In 1982, the Deposits and Acquisitions Section of the Copyright Office obtained many new acquisitions for the collections...
27. lappuse - Each Contracting State undertakes to take adequate measures to prevent the distribution on or from its territory of any programmecarrying signal by any distributor for whom the signal emitted to or passing through the satellite is not intended.
26. lappuse - ... by any carrier who has no direct or indirect control over the content or selection of the primary transmission or over the particular recipients of the secondary transmission, and whose activities with respect to the secondary transmission consist solely of providing wires, cables, or other communications channels for the use of others...
1. lappuse - It is composed of five Commissioners, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, one of whom is designated as Chairman.