The Communications Act of 1979: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Communications of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 3333, 5. daļaU.S. Government Printing Office, 1980 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
advertising agency airwaves Alaska applicant ascertainment process believe bill Black broadcast industry broadcast license cable systems cable TV channels Church Cincinnati Citizen Band Radio citizens commercial broadcasters Committee common carrier Communications Act Communications Regulatory Commission comparative hearing competition concerned CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Court Deerlin deregulation Director diversity effect elimination facilities Fairness Doctrine Federal Communications Commission Fred Silverman frequencies funds groups issues LIBRARY OF CONGRESS license renewal limited Lionel Van Deerlin Long Island marketplace forces minority needs networks nonprofit OETNC Ohio operate opportunity ownership present private carriage telecommunications programming proposed legislation public broadcast stations public broadcast system public interest standard public service public telecommunications radio and television radio stations regulation religious renewal process representatives requirements responsibility rewrite San Diego spectrum Subcommittee on Communications technologies television stations testimony WESH WHDH WNCN women York
Populāri fragmenti
231. lappuse - It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.
75. lappuse - ... 1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes 2. The nature of the copyrighted work 3.
75. lappuse - Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
34. lappuse - They have not communicated to the majority of their audience — which is white — a sense of the degradation, misery and hopelessness of life in the ghetto.
26. lappuse - The petition shall contain specific allegations of fact sufficient to show that the petitioner is a party in interest and that a grant of the application would be prima facie inconsistent with subsection (a).
95. lappuse - Corporation is a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of...
186. lappuse - It is true that the best way for this country to produce wealth is by private enterprise for private profit. But there are a lot of other things that need to be done besides producing wealth and selling goods. One of them is to inform, instruct and entertain the people through the media of mass communications. And among these media there must be some which aim not at popularity and profit, but at excellence and the good life.
4. lappuse - Because of the scarcity of radio frequencies, the Government is permitted to put restraints on licensees in favor of others whose views should be expressed on this unique medium. But the people as a whole retain their interest in free speech by radio and their collective right to have the medium function consistently with the ends and purposes of the First Amendment. It is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount.
169. lappuse - It does not violate the First Amendment to treat licensees given the privilege of using scarce radio frequencies as proxies for the entire community, obligated to give suitable time and attention to matters of great public concern.
186. lappuse - ... education for evil? Why should it not be subsidized and endowed as are the universities and the public schools and the exploration of space and modern medical research, and indeed the churches— and so many other institutions which are essential to a good society, yet cannot be operated for profit? They are unwise friends of our system of private capitalism who do not recognize the fact that the higher life of our society depends on respect for and support of non-commercial institutions.